Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
Markus Jork <mjork@juniper.net> Tue, 07 March 2017 14:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mjork@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10780126DFB; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:50:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWOsduFkLovd; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:49:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0093.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B74F1294BF; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:46:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=fi3tTgnPW/1Y1bMyqi3dit25KCxj1nHur7gqNdklKOQ=; b=gjG0Z3GvxfDk2pWP0aYbS0N273BU0TiF3HP4w3mPH3is8s9x/vR+ReMrJDgrv49YBZNyZSOa4afQU0a0r6EYLUBabw4Q5XBcHRnZMsEfIz+2vIgjbijEMETH1va6msPJip/dSEjZNHIyym5efwqkEi3fgVyQrjxQtESUkru3hes=
Received: from SN2PR05MB2653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.212.136) by BN6PR05MB3075.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.172.145.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.961.8; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:46:43 +0000
Received: from SN2PR05MB2653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.212.136]) by SN2PR05MB2653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.212.136]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.015; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:46:43 +0000
From: Markus Jork <mjork@juniper.net>
To: "EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, "ningso01@gmail.com" <ningso01@gmail.com>, "hliu@ciena.com" <hliu@ciena.com>, "zhenbin.li@huawei.com" <zhenbin.li@huawei.com>, Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, "fengman.xu@verizon.com" <fengman.xu@verizon.com>, "mehmet.toy@verizon.com" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>, "liulei.kddi@gmail.com" <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>, "renwei.li@huawei.com" <renwei.li@huawei.com>, "quintin.zhao@huawei.com" <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "Boris.Zhang@telus.com" <Boris.Zhang@telus.com>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
Thread-Index: AQHSlsFgAGuQw8n5kE+Ntyj9cnVHPqGJdP5Q
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 14:46:42 +0000
Message-ID: <SN2PR05MB2653DD5B99AA40614D3A3E1DA52F0@SN2PR05MB2653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-ld-processed: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB3075; 7:xFpLnGkE1HhNB+wlKvI28EzZiBmQly5GFxLd5j8Vnt57u06Zy7Zp32JCXBbCaQfXqfY4ns3Vdk1Yd2qwM4C9CESiaYV9Q42yOx3FPMyWaxYqZQZd/y4OyRrJSMFMzX3C+k01q7ujVuDfjd62UzXytxpsLNLbHpSb7FJHa+xRZ6PO6c1myaQrtSzWAOcCNvNX/35etdetmhsy8v1MihzHH/7hwkhDRQ7oRN0ZWxdCgP/6l0xtsdK8z+OngjGct4sYxKMSQwhWCJN7vaZBdLJZstUHXOSHAHE28khX/fqtw+Idd067zsANdqBEjA/zxgceG0VprndKp0brSucrsBxJfg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(39860400002)(377454003)(9686003)(6306002)(53936002)(236005)(38730400002)(3280700002)(54896002)(8936002)(6436002)(8676002)(790700001)(7696004)(3660700001)(3846002)(6116002)(122556002)(81166006)(54906002)(102836003)(86362001)(2201001)(2906002)(2501003)(6506006)(606005)(230783001)(5660300001)(189998001)(25786008)(55016002)(6246003)(99286003)(50986999)(966004)(4326008)(1941001)(7736002)(2950100002)(14971765001)(39060400002)(74316002)(2900100001)(7906003)(54356999)(76176999)(106116001)(66066001)(7416002)(229853002)(53546006)(33656002)(77096006)(921003)(1121003)(491001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB3075; H:SN2PR05MB2653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a77eb3fd-d429-4f02-9281-08d46568c583
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3075;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR05MB3075DE3E14363E55B577343CA52F0@BN6PR05MB3075.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(50582790962513)(95692535739014)(271855227111920)(21748063052155)(154440410675630)(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:BN6PR05MB3075; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR05MB3075;
x-forefront-prvs: 0239D46DB6
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN2PR05MB2653DD5B99AA40614D3A3E1DA52F0SN2PR05MB2653namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Mar 2017 14:46:42.9119 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB3075
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 14:50:04 -0000
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. -Markus From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 4:34 PM To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>; Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>; ningso01@gmail.com; hliu@ciena.com; zhenbin.li@huawei.com; Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>; Tarek Saad (tsaad) <tsaad@cisco.com>; fengman.xu@verizon.com; mehmet.toy@verizon.com; liulei.kddi@gmail.com; renwei.li@huawei.com; quintin.zhao@huawei.com; Boris.Zhang@telus.com; Markus Jork <mjork@juniper.net> Cc: teas@ietf.org; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Pavan and Lou PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
- [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingr… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-r… mehmet.toy
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Richard Li
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… LEI LIU
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… ningso01
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Boris Zhang
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Markus Jork
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Yimin Shen
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Raveendra Torvi
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Quintin zhao
- [Teas] 答复: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-r… fengman.xu
- Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-r… Liu, Hua
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-… Vishnu Pavan Beeram