[Teas] Feedback on options for issue #1 in TE tunnel YANG

"Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7991F12D909; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2RFkjuIjMKn; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC1912D8C4; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2692; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469105983; x=1470315583; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=PuZNpxREUl50ed3YZ9RlVBMsYIRy9uEB4DrUUydsLGY=; b=fti9aauBxs/djjRqxao/MG6duaZlDZ+7lH0pGzN8By1Tuwg5MTSwMLC8 rHBgeXa6F1flBEl6/XjvcdWFsSi0hdJDb5ajllaskCTZarmAoO+Hxa9ca 4Wp0H9FCIs7uqVAmW6JGAmYoHZhkRfom7W1n1K+4IKhoyJLNHpaDYgNgQ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B3AgC1xpBX/4UNJK1dgnFOVnwGs1yCdYIPgXsihXgegRE4FAEBAQEBAQFlHAuEYyNIDhIBDAE9AgQwJwQODognDq8hjWwBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIYqgXiKFiuCLwWZJgGBNI02jzqQIAEeNoNzbgGGTn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,399,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="298713393"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jul 2016 12:59:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6LCxg7n024509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:59:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:59:42 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:59:42 -0400
From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>
To: "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Feedback on options for issue #1 in TE tunnel YANG
Thread-Index: AQHR40+/+ckpgGliikuVQKDwySwMQg==
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:59:42 +0000
Message-ID: <5717BEB6-46B6-47EB-BE9B-F8A5AE2E8EFB@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.17.0.160611
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5717BEB646B647EBBE9BF8A5AE2E8EFBciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/1wLxwBcnSbeww6HU-vBKdn-1EsU>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Feedback on options for issue #1 in TE tunnel YANG
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:59:48 -0000

Hi YANG doctors,

We have a requirement to reuse generic data across multiple technology model instantiations for model we’re driving in draft-ietf-teas-yang-te. For this, we've identified a number of proposals and tried to summarize them in slides 7-10 in the deck @ http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-teas-3.pptx

We are seeking your expert advice on the best way of the options to proceed with and whether there’s a precedence in other IETF models that have solved similar issues.

Regards,
Tarek (and co-authors)