IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Drafts on slicing in SR networks

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 16 November 2020 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3832D3A0A00; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 03:25:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=labn.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJCk-fugJbWe; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 03:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr750103.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.75.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629F13A09FF; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 03:25:32 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LmbN8S6tKBv/rPceDP/rvqL8JmXARUc6kXVS1A9r09mRJ9NQoqWeXGc/iBDUw16zfIO/iQQ7OSpt1ZWAUBdFJKWNOwOg51Add0Iv+/qB9xXmqSXV4Y/MY4THTs3LBd6POHT8VaHfAVFfSVW9qP+wwSdtCBwNb97bpzrUz/VlO+BJDjirkec1UzW7mbccvaEnjammAKSn9rQOwyGcnreOW7RTW3UGIXTBI5hpXuSvVMzv+GFrdNp4xSA42I0lFVA6QK+UPLDFq5szVYT5cKKLKD+UGBjJyuftQ4f4uHAe6wsMbE9a68tlSTqnpcPQpcfOIdtMvtmix8GTi5CbmOoM8g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qdKgY5jZBwrAaxGd2Y0ng9EhdWeO5JGq+YmPf4fLVZI=; b=XxAbZTj3W1PTJ+dBAyJNx0gRwrO1Tjsq7IqcLxFmFenbNo+VjBZ+bzMtBG5CEh1Otk7adktst0JzpWkc6RL7yAXzTiEhioJpGE0qSabE1k/lGhUJToGFlNt0+v6+HXf+q/s92d3E1W1ewIGPSRRSJGreISMG4W5RWarKCQhcUax2uAibd5ujnyvDensqb279AQQx1yar+bDQ9kA2Bw0kKWynz2ccKdwUcwv5KO+B2y4fg6CM0axOIldaUfPEE/a9Uq6seAAL69c2x6y7QaQf9XdchTCO9vFjPJuRmgCGBPBzjWmMat3Hzhvcb86DFsQUcmUUcDZ2J5kUAxTAIYRV8A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=labn.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=labn.net; dkim=pass header.d=labn.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-labn-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qdKgY5jZBwrAaxGd2Y0ng9EhdWeO5JGq+YmPf4fLVZI=; b=g6EUXlbMzQGeXUrlo+eacsBsrS5SqJVsxPbYfUvreMy3KVBk+BkirHIKsKN7KW83HE5mprpt5Iws75j9vc/tb8lGBKdHAQ2e8W2lwby7bd5vxobVyJoqp/jpijvqRqNQICGv9N7yXMtIC8MiNBa9qN67M8CoPpYnW8YwAOkuGzM=
Authentication-Results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=labn.net;
Received: from BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:1c7::24) by BL0PR14MB3746.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:1c3::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3564.28; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:30 +0000
Received: from BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cc1f:b1ba:b525:74da]) by BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cc1f:b1ba:b525:74da%8]) with mapi id 15.20.3564.028; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:30 +0000
To: draft-peng-teas-network-slicing@ietf.org, draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <d2164756-fa54-b812-8fd9-81816c2833e1@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 06:25:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [100.15.105.234]
X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR19CA0011.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:178::24) To BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:1c7::24)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (100.15.105.234) by MN2PR19CA0011.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:178::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3564.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:30 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 673b81d8-d9eb-45e7-2f3d-08d88a22537f
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BL0PR14MB3746:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <BL0PR14MB374619E1E9097EE8F0E0164EC3E30@BL0PR14MB3746.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: ZUQN/n/0HZh8oJhKyxEOxtQjJUk1igFCg8VPAlbCfVg1isz2DYzrx/a0/DO85cc3w7klI7qLmDEtsSpjtpBEsnEikZQSfA7sil7567R5bEr+deFhru3fGg+j0+r2Y9OZ2tetTEHX4tT4Xt2PuCJKw5lyBTyDTQLNyXVVEjlV4PpCbNMDngHgniAsFSn/tSXy3NQUSq1VFq+iygmAoab7vIbOW2hn1IS6CL1LQmn7X+j+AZmu0TBwKth/A9Gu2y/Pj0YfE0lb3zQk+7NbS8j4l+BIUoKwqdyXaaTsfU8o7qT24VBHtZUd7vzlOxKAMxD3XL5xOBSWj7RxWdTd1ToyRndvu0SZjT1XctMbA1wu2ApwnLY+tOo9MS8RV15MNIJ7
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(136003)(39830400003)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(6486002)(31696002)(316002)(8676002)(8936002)(478600001)(86362001)(26005)(186003)(16526019)(2616005)(66946007)(4326008)(4744005)(5660300002)(450100002)(66556008)(31686004)(36756003)(66476007)(2906002)(52116002)(956004)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: labn.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 673b81d8-d9eb-45e7-2f3d-08d88a22537f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2020 11:25:30.8027 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: eb60ac54-2184-4344-9b60-40c8b2b72561
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: PH2inNM/MwCdR3lXV6fpKH2aqYXt7AHKIx+2TvLhGIYE7P9DC+aKscfQjF/PKRUa2axslQxlHkg3Y5dYWsxauQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR14MB3746
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/2CfOU1G6CIpPkMkdoWdx2MkgDoo>
Subject: [Teas] Drafts on slicing in SR networks
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:25:34 -0000

Authors,

     Apologies for the lack of time to discuss your drafts in today's 
TEAS WG meeting.  I note that both cover overlapping topics, i.e., 
slicing in SR networks.  Would it be possible/reasonable for the authors 
to try to work together to come up with a joint proposal for 
consideration by the WG?  I do note that one document is solely on SR 
with the other covers SR and non-SR usage.

Thank you,

Lou (as Chair)

v2.20.1 | Report a Bug | By Email