Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-04

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 28 October 2017 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E18F139F18; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YkkS8rYEAsr; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B2113F48D; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 1so10645985qtn.3; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=G71QgH4PsvU2/0Ju/Zd1P7qkFHTVrNIfomN627altnw=; b=WFWulc9oUNj2Hnifj9UkqoLJf0PxQXzBptnNdVATZkv0fs+3w7MhTA6CK5gEl1OEZl OzS7vyvl9CHM5cpErHztrkCIUL0quKVF2Y+neR5M74p2N1bXBBaTkcJVoTnGOrjqnyJ5 W6s6QdBxOUxGeaZxzvHaoJgeCFqNPdSM67ONWmsUx7MOfRxWX55MKsvnA9Ucvbfk/ALD o0UR6hC98iuIELBzm2TKykW6Kkn+vFNTcTZ97zlWAoXGS7aJSNw2hSh6C587qSxju+AU NTkp3wS/Pc9+WX/WOl6AvEtpU0WX9LfkL1eXaZKhWK+CAerSjjzresE5MeDizZER4ckX o/QQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G71QgH4PsvU2/0Ju/Zd1P7qkFHTVrNIfomN627altnw=; b=bMcuue5zvetZyr6nBmBcSl23olxYg0nJAZa5KKg51awM/JQ/XysLKEcr5KYjo/GwNo hPUHgAXLEI0nTms0cstZ+0V6ACuJNb41GCOPlt3hVC7bE4W+HXDvPRQP4qqrVAwSR03o 9sCwKnkKLqJb6WDLIwhc4j0o+39HpVy4AvW/VK/VhXQ3ED1auvRSGn1M/LrTm+l4iz6q n8kORJZcrFEIxMyVKE7OoGS9LBz/t5CfdY0I3ea9Lq9W2fxuKWMud/i41kFBxfmphho6 5Un5n7BaHGOpR2JaXYt+PERoHOrkhx24C45YR0KBRO6GnDCwUL18vZS7Aw4s5zlSKriB nu8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVZDcqJTA+IAP+gKqplj/cxjp1uBf4XRJ0/euRzXzSmTKThksOZ PqCNs47QXKlLPg1iMu2V9X85//kXXU73XXGBDn8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+R3VKfnD5WDJRQXAghqxISMvPyF0SiJP4ALY4DjD5qdsvYJYax1RGvfpoE0TtTZRPDZHWc0sZT1Fc5OwaqPWpY=
X-Received: by 10.200.39.238 with SMTP id x43mr4357043qtx.154.1509159521825; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.86.17 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 19:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTt5cvGjTr+Sevso2enV1sudC_YWTsRs1EUaenj8ACpg_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTt5cvGjTr+Sevso2enV1sudC_YWTsRs1EUaenj8ACpg_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:28:41 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0F0tkFNpkIArA_KpQ2wo27_cwho
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7XTw67EzBGqQqe0hreUQFV68HRMxoW-bFP6ibEVexL5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, =?UTF-8?B?7Jyk67mI7JiB?= <byyun@etri.re.kr>, Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, "Zhangxian (Xian)" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141042235397a055c9295a1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/2LJGNECGeJjy8s8VAcc3IGN3az8>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-04
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 02:58:44 -0000

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

Regards,
Dhruv

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>