Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 03 August 2022 22:14 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A63AC14792A; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.924
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l9MpMy__SeS7; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9899C14CF10; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 273MEpQB015681; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:14:51 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742A34604B; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:14:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E5F46048; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:14:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:14:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.40.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 273MEoGs026869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:14:51 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
References: <165956437769.55050.16490105634807702976@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <165956437769.55050.16490105634807702976@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 23:14:49 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0f3d01d8a786$731d5cb0$59581610$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGS5zx7ikh2kowVGQQtdXvNp8QeIq4pPFeQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.40.1
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27056.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.500-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.500-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27056.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--19.499700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +f/wAVSGjujmicbHRUsaV3FPUrVDm6jtC//1TMV5chNLcvHInxh9FOZk XqvcLVUN05uvOBM7hCcn8TQwnJ+7zujZlYzLbgNfjrVn4cme+w6S3G9UxpYxsLV5fSMRD1zqH2x IX19gk18mIqeQuFlBZPuX8LWcyG/uAhgHKcq5Rir7gWP0TNHLHGHft7VNM0ClT9xG+Pmy0/p/vf +tHS6GXtBKZ4nBEMJkL6kOgjXEP671lGRVqRJJbd5x7RpGJf1axMZq+YajS9b7s8CQBJM67uEmR OSC5Th4gxB+FYjFEpfS0XI18B0C9Rsf4+akXti5ngIgpj8eDcC063Wh9WVqgqbyPFGTn+O4OeLY FhdUjW50HSe131POnuJGF26G8SWy5yM0c1ktj9M=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/2S7zpqpP7MCARMFwDW-TjYI8X00>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 22:14:57 -0000
Hi Chairs (and WG), This version includes the additional appendixes as discussed on the list. I believe we are done with this document and we should push it through WG last call, getting thorough review as we do it. I think that is fairly pressing to reach conclusion on this framework so that the other dependent documents know that they are building on stable foundations. Thanks, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: 03 August 2022 23:06 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: teas@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling WG of the IETF. Title : Framework for IETF Network Slices Authors : Adrian Farrel John Drake Reza Rokui Shunsuke Homma Kiran Makhijani Luis M. Contreras Jeff Tantsura Filename : draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt Pages : 51 Date : 2022-08-03 Abstract: This document describes network slicing in the context of networks built from IETF technologies. It defines the term "IETF Network Slice" and establishes the general principles of network slicing in the IETF context. The document discusses the general framework for requesting and operating IETF Network Slices, the characteristics of an IETF Network Slice, the necessary system components and interfaces, and how abstract requests can be mapped to more specific technologies. The document also discusses related considerations with monitoring and security. This document also provides definitions of related terms to enable consistent usage in other IETF documents that describe or use aspects of IETF Network Slices. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
- [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-s… internet-drafts
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-netwo… Adrian Farrel
- [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated call… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-i… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Adrian Farrel
- [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for las… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … peng.shaofu
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] Default NRP definition [Was: Repeated … Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] NRP definition [Was: Repeated call for… Joel Halpern