[Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0859130DFC; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model@ietf.org, Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, teas-chairs@ietf.org, vbeeram@juniper.net, teas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152946443878.32118.12988456809974943244.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:13:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/2sS7SIEWSmA6oBxqgQrIDfUyAhg>
Subject: [Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:13:59 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


What is the goal of publishing this as an RFC? It seems like an intermediate
document that doesn't have archival value. I do not find publication of an
information model mentioned on the TEAS charter, but maybe I missed it.

§9: There are three upper-case SHOULDs in this section, but no RFC 8174 or 2119
boilerplate. Normative keywords don't really seem appropriate for an
information model, so perhaps they should be lower case?