Re: [Teas] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-14: (with COMMENT)

[Daniele Ceccarelli <[e-mail]>]

Hi Martin,

cleaning up a bit
[snip]

> > [DC] We’re referring to the documents that describe the ACTN MPI and
> > CMI interfaces. (which is basically a set of YANG models like e.g. the
> > TE-Topology, TE-tunnel, etc). Basically the idea is: “I’m not telling
> > you here what you have to implement to be compliant with and ACTN MPI,
> > but it you can implement and ACTN MPI on top of one of the boxes
> > listed above, such box can be put into the ACTN controllers hierarchy
> > and that works just fine”.
> ok ...
> So you're saying that what an implementation would have to comply with is
> out of the scope of this document. Why not be explicit about that?
> 
[>DC] Exactly. Yes, worth saying it.

> What about my comment on NBI?
[>DC] missed it sorry. Since it occurs just once we can extend it. 

[snip]
> >
> > 4.1. MDSC Hierarchy
> >
> > Can there be more than two levels in the MDSC hierarchy? In other
> > words, can an MDSC-L for an MDSC-H be itself an MDSC-H for an MDSC-L?
> > As a side note, since I made the mistake while writing this, you have
> > two occurrences of MSDC (instead of MDSC) in the doc .
[>DC] will fix it too.
> >
> > [DC] exactly, yes.
> Wouldn't it be worth saying it?
[>DC] Ok. What about this addition in section 4.1:

OLD
The hierarchy of MDSCs can be seen in Figure 4.

NEW
The hierarchy of MDSC can be recursive, where an MDSC-H is in turn an MDSC-L to an higher level MDSC-H. An example of hierarchy can be seen in Figure 4. 



> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Daniele