IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Advancing some documents

"King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk> Wed, 15 June 2016 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F1112D9B6 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1Nxn1ocZE5I for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mh-0-1.lancs.ac.uk (mh-0-1.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.65.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A67D12D7FE for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ex-1-ht0.lancs.ac.uk ([10.42.18.57] helo=EX-1-HT0.lancs.local) by mh-0-1.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>) id 1bDDzZ-000Cfe-VI for teas@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:48:37 +0100
Received: from EX-0-MB2.lancs.local ([fe80::9d98:936b:54d1:c531]) by EX-1-HT0.lancs.local ([fe80::d9e8:ad10:d075:a6b6%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:48:37 +0100
From: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Advancing some documents
Thread-Index: AQITuav8ZqGtJqlaMXVabGXmIuk8lQG9ZDcEAZOAKIGfTEzAgA==
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:48:36 +0000
Message-ID: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BD0B9FD@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
References: <118601d1bbe7$f97eeee0$ec7ccca0$@olddog.co.uk> <8f320642-5265-0e70-3384-f51189b5aa38@labn.net> <CADOd8-ss5h8Gxisk-h=2G9jpS9NT5ngjdSXnubzaUadeixsqrQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADOd8-ss5h8Gxisk-h=2G9jpS9NT5ngjdSXnubzaUadeixsqrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [213.205.198.170]
x-iss-local-domain: 1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BD0B9FDEX0MB2lancsloca_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/3NWM3okOHxPIW0kAYtdeQyxgR2Q>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Advancing some documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:48:44 -0000

Hi All,

Just like to echo Cyril’s comments that the PCE-based control architecture is a really interesting topic and the authors have done great job of documenting recent discussions on and off the PCE list.

The current open source SDN controller platforms already implement some basic PCE architecture and PCEP extensions, but there is growing trend for more capability (TE automation, optimisation and resiliency) to be enabled using PCEP. Having this document that summarises architecture, applicability and capability - and possible gaps - is very useful. I would also like to see the document progress in the TEAS WG.

BR, Dan.

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Margaria
Sent: 15 June 2016 14:39
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: 'Adrian Farrel' (adrian@olddog.co.uk) <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; teas-chairs@ietf.org; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Advancing some documents

Hi,

I am supporting the draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function dcocument and look forward to see it progress in the WG.
This is a good summary of the current architectures and discussions.
Best Regards,
Cyril


On 3 June 2016 at 18:46, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Adrian,

Thanks question, see below.


On 6/1/2016 5:28 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi chairs,
>
> I think there are a few drafts that have been discussed on the mailing list and
> which the authors believe are within scope for TEAS and would be better
> progressed if adopted by the Working Group. Of course, all of these can continue
> to be consolidated and are open for review and discussions on the mailing list,
> but if you are able to share a plan for these documents that would be helpful:
> Is anything further needed from the authors before these can advance?
>
> draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework
A poll on this will be out shortly.
> draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
It would be good to get a little more on this one from the WG -- either
on list or in session. We individually are supportive of the work and
look forward to seeing in pursued in the WG.

> draft-zhuang-teas-scheduled-resources
The merges look good - but there's only been a few comments on the list
since it was updated.  So this falls into the same boat as the prior
draft. - We'd like to hear more from the WG before polling.

Thanks,
Lou and Pavan
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>


_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email