Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01.txt

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Tue, 05 May 2015 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D581B2D77; Mon, 4 May 2015 19:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WrZIYBLh6bAT; Mon, 4 May 2015 19:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9CCE1B2D8E; Mon, 4 May 2015 19:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVQ86496; Tue, 05 May 2015 02:00:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.47) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 5 May 2015 03:00:38 +0100
Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.185]) by BLREML408-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.47]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 5 May 2015 07:30:33 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQg0YOC1xsesgABE6SlAvtLx39TJ1lKlqAgAbYgwCAAKTfsA==
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 02:00:32 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870A9F0E@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <20150430130302.28745.62590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAB75xn5AXU6n3T_Dk6DuKApm+r1SxLanF3RU_R=+akswLPm9Hg@mail.gmail.com> <5547E714.3060303@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <5547E714.3060303@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.146.248]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/3tJ2xGEQqRsh3F6pMhL4wn7lMqk>
Cc: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 02:00:45 -0000

Yes! 

Thanks, 
Dhruv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: 05 May 2015 03:10
> To: Dhruv Dhody; draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects@ietf.org
> Cc: TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)
> Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-
> 01.txt
> 
> 
> Dhruv/Authors,
>     Do you think the document is ready for LC?
> 
> Thanks,
> Lou
> 
> On 4/30/2015 9:07 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> > Hi WG,
> >
> > Based on the comments received during the PCE WG LC of the companion
> > document, the TEAS I-D is also updated. During the update we have
> > tried to also check as per the guidelines in the wiki
> > (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/trac/wiki/PSGuidelines).
> >
> > Summary of the changes -
> >
> > - A section "scope" added to describe the experiment
> > - 2119 language corrections
> > - Correction in the Length field for ISIS subobject
> > - Handling of unknown subobject (as per the existing specifications)
> > - Update in IANA consideration
> > - Changes in the References
> > - Changes in the examples (appendix)
> >
> > Please check the diff at -
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subob
> > jects-01
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors)
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:33 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >     directories.
> >      This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture
> >     and Signaling Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> >             Title           : Domain Subobjects for Resource
> >     ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
> >             Authors         : Dhruv Dhody
> >                               Udayasree Palle
> >                               Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy
> >                               Ramon Casellas
> >             Filename        :
> >     draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01.txt
> >             Pages           : 16
> >             Date            : 2015-04-30
> >
> >     Abstract:
> >        The Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
> >        specification and the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching
> >        (GMPLS) extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to
> >        be explicitly included in a path setup.  Further Exclude Routes
> >        extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to be
> >        explicitly excluded in a path setup.
> >
> >        This document specifies new subobjects to include or exclude
> >     domains
> >        during path setup where domain is a collection of network elements
> >        within a common sphere of address management or path computational
> >        responsibility (such as an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) area
> >     or an
> >        Autonomous System (AS)).  Note that the use of AS as an
> >     abstract node
> >        representing domain is already defined in existing RSVP-TE
> >        specefications, albeit with a 2-Byte AS number.
> >
> >
> >     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobj
> > ects/
> >
> >     There's also a htmlized version available at:
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-
> > 01
> >
> >     A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >
> > https:https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain
> > -subobjects-01
> >
> >
> >     Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >     submission
> >     until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> >     tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>.
> >
> >     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> >     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Teas mailing list
> >     Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas