Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2B03A0886; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8wm3eMnGJHo; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75AB83A0882; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id i25so8427713iog.0; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Puunxx4tkEFeslMTWzfQW/pzVknWQXlLM+dFVrvBEPQ=; b=k+gv/flh1PiVBGOy0detd+zec3YL8bdEpc5gaTpteSlaYUEUk8gaoWOvbwTe0LLWrn M9FWNH+GiDDwDQ2bWG9odae08pql5cMOAxdAoxyLfsb5bAmaSGo1xJ4F0kcgSaxqN5fX kxRWhMAxQ2epW9uFvWtBUxiqjg8UiMQ3W6DCaAwSwgIIXFBik7mu2dplLUymSzErQw0m rsFUozt6teSaH7Drrkme+t9RgqJTMNt7XgYeZ8to4GGP/0WOShCpgqhXrNLslOG0TrLC cpop1ZbjhJIr9rz3XIRgQgnfDDgqV7EaJeY1S0t1bm3XwZFhjtVky+KrtRdz9b4Xcm7i TKpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Puunxx4tkEFeslMTWzfQW/pzVknWQXlLM+dFVrvBEPQ=; b=UBdA/ihs5B6zrp5KqzVWflJ2rVxkGirLPw4E4S9U9WYD0539cTWPMwJ2fFhnrz0wNJ cleQafzuIIZNlVLj5nzRyWL95Ztx49TMpWEaiVapLcMOeIk5wEcE+DQNnKbkaH3FUxNW EGZzB//ieOft29Y5DMAxn6uwFBckyJfdG3Bv7gVyJnizTG9bKEEJGZMQ3Qk0XCgCUaVA DKjnJK24OydKJyWoHVjXYnil9MwQk2eWKcniMH2dKdGkrizsivesSI5f0h09F/4ODhiE hy2YqlR4yTGdc/knTNo1u5T4Lz95Ep72busbsdG7Po1YOOPMJE74zA96Kie3hqkRf/j7 n1nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gLT28gyCdIDb33TFVMH91HaYKzyG9pycNWM9kZDqaDsSK5zPJ xNq7LKFpWF+BtemQgKcbvr6x4/XQp1jrmD4GsEmL9I0p
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE8HafBrdxuRk8Yo3N1YpTpw2Gnb6oBC6RVImTQGmTYfM4gP2fWu89blhLUNMlb4kyFBLr9lOP4zYBx+T36os=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:950a:: with SMTP id y10mr23589514jah.42.1591714462069; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTuZggA3eCMPfhErX=RvbuC3AjoPEeCB_TbuqJgYc8a4SQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+YzgTuL_CYhzz_grMoS44bLF-aYWHbHweY_+utt9YFbP4KVfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTuL_CYhzz_grMoS44bLF-aYWHbHweY_+utt9YFbP4KVfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:54:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsfRSY_Ry_xKsUgLUOmqaaUfSD7PHkkWrmcsoca1rTsCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018769c05a7a7e7a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/5mbCAmT6jjzmj2TCg0YHAhuIIgQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:54:25 -0000

>
> Fixed <Subject>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:50 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>>
>>   Please state either:
>>
>>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>   or
>>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>   or
>>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>   appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
>> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
>> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>> and
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Pavan
>>
>