Return-Path: X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2B03A0886; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:54:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8wm3eMnGJHo; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75AB83A0882; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id i25so8427713iog.0; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Puunxx4tkEFeslMTWzfQW/pzVknWQXlLM+dFVrvBEPQ=; b=k+gv/flh1PiVBGOy0detd+zec3YL8bdEpc5gaTpteSlaYUEUk8gaoWOvbwTe0LLWrn M9FWNH+GiDDwDQ2bWG9odae08pql5cMOAxdAoxyLfsb5bAmaSGo1xJ4F0kcgSaxqN5fX kxRWhMAxQ2epW9uFvWtBUxiqjg8UiMQ3W6DCaAwSwgIIXFBik7mu2dplLUymSzErQw0m rsFUozt6teSaH7Drrkme+t9RgqJTMNt7XgYeZ8to4GGP/0WOShCpgqhXrNLslOG0TrLC cpop1ZbjhJIr9rz3XIRgQgnfDDgqV7EaJeY1S0t1bm3XwZFhjtVky+KrtRdz9b4Xcm7i TKpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Puunxx4tkEFeslMTWzfQW/pzVknWQXlLM+dFVrvBEPQ=; b=UBdA/ihs5B6zrp5KqzVWflJ2rVxkGirLPw4E4S9U9WYD0539cTWPMwJ2fFhnrz0wNJ cleQafzuIIZNlVLj5nzRyWL95Ztx49TMpWEaiVapLcMOeIk5wEcE+DQNnKbkaH3FUxNW EGZzB//ieOft29Y5DMAxn6uwFBckyJfdG3Bv7gVyJnizTG9bKEEJGZMQ3Qk0XCgCUaVA DKjnJK24OydKJyWoHVjXYnil9MwQk2eWKcniMH2dKdGkrizsivesSI5f0h09F/4ODhiE hy2YqlR4yTGdc/knTNo1u5T4Lz95Ep72busbsdG7Po1YOOPMJE74zA96Kie3hqkRf/j7 n1nw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gLT28gyCdIDb33TFVMH91HaYKzyG9pycNWM9kZDqaDsSK5zPJ xNq7LKFpWF+BtemQgKcbvr6x4/XQp1jrmD4GsEmL9I0p X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE8HafBrdxuRk8Yo3N1YpTpw2Gnb6oBC6RVImTQGmTYfM4gP2fWu89blhLUNMlb4kyFBLr9lOP4zYBx+T36os= X-Received: by 2002:a02:950a:: with SMTP id y10mr23589514jah.42.1591714462069; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:54:11 -0500 Message-ID: To: Adrian Farrel , Gert Grammel , Loa Andersson , Xufeng Liu , Lou Berger Cc: TEAS WG , TEAS WG Chairs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018769c05a7a7e7a0" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11 X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:54:25 -0000 --00000000000018769c05a7a7e7a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Fixed > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:50 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram > wrote: > >> Authors, Contributors, WG, >> >> As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption: >> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? >> >> Please state either: >> >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >> or >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? >> >> If yes to the above, please state either: >> >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >> or >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >> >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >> appropriate. >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS >> MESSAGE'S TO LINES. >> >> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed >> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under >> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are >> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from >> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your >> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above >> and >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. >> >> Thank you, >> Pavan >> > --00000000000018769c05a7a7e7a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fixed <Subject>

On Tue, Jun 9= , 2020 at 9:50 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote:
Author= s, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for=C2=A0polling=C2= =A0for WG document=C2=A0adoption:

Are you aware of any=C2=A0IPR=C2= =A0that applies to draft identified above?

=C2=A0 Please state eithe= r:

=C2=A0 "No, I'm not aware of any=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0that appl= ies to this draft"
=C2=A0 or
=C2=A0 "Yes, I'm aware of= =C2=A0IPR=C2=A0that applies to this draft"

If so, has this=C2= =A0IPR=C2=A0been disclosed in compliance with IETF=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0rules
(= see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the = above, please state either:

=C2=A0 "Yes, the=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0has = been disclosed in compliance with IETF=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0rules"
=C2=A0 = or
=C2=A0 "No, the=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0has not been disclosed"
If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
=C2= =A0 appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contribut= or please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whe= ther or not you are
aware of any relevant=C2=A0IPR.=C2=A0 This document = will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received fr= om each author and listed
contributor.=C2=A0 NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL O= F YOU LISTED IN THIS=C2=A0
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you = are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an = author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF= =C2=A0IPR=C2=A0rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
= aware of=C2=A0IPR=C2=A0of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain fro= m
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
und= isclosed=C2=A0IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed aboveand
http://trac.tools.ietf.= org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan
--00000000000018769c05a7a7e7a0--