Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03.txt

daniel@olddog.co.uk Mon, 16 November 2020 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8280B3A16D4 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:50:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCrLKrFJ7NwK for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19ED3A16C4 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id b6so17956054wrt.4 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:50:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=p7Y5Vrt+3cTDtaqX3AmwKvRKKWAmBdn1gHYw+ivvJuk=; b=fRx+bPyHuWHWOIHE/USKwX6TcgZsxX2jUyTcAor8uiUwMmKQUb+Az4r6aQltnAdW8K Jh5AdtIxK5YoaS167rzI5TJnhwtbMM5InKPK15QMM9CkjmysrCsXGq7IkziuykvXAVyr lOxyhJUul3HHg3oeqnC5cM9EY6BmB2r3TC0UWBMxzv7ilh6+jBp8N1FBxPTMiAMDh7cv LvgLIxvuFtCmv7sv9V01WoIj3X9flCdtKELx0n5Own0GgQwL6mpJrJxR1CQ+liqstkY0 7JBVW6jJhXu6N2cnHPYztjJRXV5Lhx1X9V1oBICi/he6XTKgeBhfrLGdRArcnZ8Ra1da EyRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=p7Y5Vrt+3cTDtaqX3AmwKvRKKWAmBdn1gHYw+ivvJuk=; b=oVsYk9ivPo/i2YuwaYRxUqd980nvi4QnBXLdPs/9Wrcqhl0JwZ+TunFQMeoF6kRMCb dUkFnIe+5NUtQrDdiTszvL1L8/5yg5VXiK57L4izfeU2SO8/mib9+n63Dn2+gLEfD+R1 Iuw6ICurA2+uFrKHMDljMkmMZmWINT7/XdvAF5gqx8gtT2/PRCv5jjJYnOwT9eYfYDzh uOcPIcdVCSwlxhqEulBUo58TZNryGeqnxQ66Ud+Vv9tk90H/hje2i04BtssrUFW6tIdR bSiwHXWIeR5w9Zw7YrxZamY+mRB927+uUEKRqmuwTl3qIG7haIb4VZrktgdvElKG/nAX EAzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LmCfbe1V/pzO1Gx3nu0IjOzdt9w8L3xfKDpMa9GJ02SN10gJ0 IZzzPgR+1NGVPON6Rpd5IL+wjjpdvjhmRBt6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQMOdUojzJ49+mUW0OhnaLd4GJbduchbzdFaAKPctOkJ87jtTScAdpEf5qXRBmziQs9XQi9Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:187:: with SMTP id p7mr18610010wrx.240.1605520201870; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CIPHER ([2a00:23c7:108:9201:d568:3905:dba2:4a15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v67sm19853744wma.17.2020.11.16.01.50.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 01:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: <dk@danielking.net>
From: <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: <teas@ietf.org>
References: <160551031063.11851.11765164494132345019@ietfa.amsl.com> <023001d6bbe7$307e2060$917a6120$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <023001d6bbe7$307e2060$917a6120$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <000701d6bbfd$d9d456a0$8d7d03e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFeUK7wWhwa+VSyGtYdwuerKH12PQKgEtIuqqZXpSA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/6mtZ-Ty6bieqZnMEWUVHv_w09uA>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:50:19 -0000

Hi Adrian, 

Thanks for the update during the (current) TEAS working meeting for the
work:

Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03

I will provide text for "5.3.2.  Considerations for Software Defined
Networking". 

For the benefit of others, I have summerised the sections that require
additional text contributions:

4.1.5.  QUIC
4.1.11.  TE Extensions to the IGPs
4.1.14.  Application-Layer Traffic Optimization
4.1.17.  Network Slicing
4.1.18.  Deterministic Networking
5.3.1.  Hybrid Systems
5.5.1.  Intent-Based Networking (Jeff recently mentioned he would provide
text)
 
BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 16 November 2020 07:08
To: teas@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03.txt

Hey TEAS!

I managed to carve out some more time for editorial cleaning.

Reached section 5.3 so far.

Still hoping some people will look at the empty sections (marked TBD) and
supply text.

Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 16 November 2020 07:05
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic
Engineering
        Author          : Adrian Farrel
	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03.txt
	Pages           : 75
	Date            : 2020-11-15

Abstract:
   This document describes the principles of traffic engineering (TE) in
   the Internet.  The document is intended to promote better
   understanding of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in IP
   networks and the networks that support IP networking, and to provide
   a common basis for the development of traffic engineering
   capabilities for the Internet.  The principles, architectures, and
   methodologies for performance evaluation and performance optimization
   of operational networks are also discussed.

   This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002.  This document
   obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text in
   line with best current practices for Internet traffic engineering and
   to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas