Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition

[Kiran Makhijani <[e-mail]>]

Hi Joel, 
I am ok to remove some part from Appendix only if it is included in the framework first.

But for the TSRE, I have proposed clearer and shorter text that they are not visible to the consumer of a transport slices. One of the purpose of definitions document is 'define' common terminology in the scope of transport slices, and all we are saying is that when realizing a transport slice, things TSEs will map to are called TSREs. 
I am not able to see the drawback of saying so.

Thanks
Kiran

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Halpern Direct <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 1:19 PM
> To: Kiran Makhijani <[e-mail]>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram
> <[e-mail]>; TEAS WG <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
> 
> No, your replies did not in any way address my concerns.
> 
> I would suggest removing the references to TSRE and more importantly
> removing appendix A.1, or at least the last part of the appendix.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 8/20/2020 2:54 PM, Kiran Makhijani wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> > After having replied to your comments, we have not heard further if they
> were convincing.
> > Please let us know.
> > Thanks
> > Kiran
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Teas <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 9:04 AM
> >> To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]>; TEAS WG
> >> <[e-mail]>
> >> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption -
> >> draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
> >>
> >> Without repairs to the issues I have raised on the email list, I do
> >> not think this document should be adopted as a WG document.
> >> We are close, but not quite there.
> >>
> >> Yours,
> >> Joel
> >>
> >> On 8/19/2020 11:50 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> This is start of a *three* week poll on making
> >>> draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03 a TEAS working group
> >> document.
> >>> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> >>> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> >>> document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> >>> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> >>>
> >>> The poll ends September 9th (extra week to account for vacation season).
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Pavan and Lou
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Teas mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>>
> >>
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> >>>
> >>
> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckiranm%40f
> >> utur
> >>>
> >>
> ewei.com%7Cf26ab959470747a36b2808d84459a351%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189
> >> c753a1d
> >>>
> >>
> 5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637334499094612048&amp;sdata=%2FGSlz2Q4%2B
> >> RAlZTXBv5
> >>> XlCZ9YKaUKQ7C4IUIgdQDVJ%2Bk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Teas mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >>
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww
> >> .i
> etf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckiranm%40fu
> >>
> turewei.com%7Cf26ab959470747a36b2808d84459a351%7C0fee8ff2a3b2401
> >>
> 89c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637334499094612048&amp;sdata=%2FG
> >>
> Slz2Q4%2BRAlZTXBv5XlCZ9YKaUKQ7C4IUIgdQDVJ%2Bk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> >
> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckiranm%40f
> utur
> >
> ewei.com%7C7bb861e35ac84653b62208d8454659ac%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189
> c753a1d
> >
> 5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637335515772670726&amp;sdata=MZQKraVa8fj3BL
> sLRq9T9a
> > Ypp3C%2Bu1w9c7DgIVE6kE0%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >