IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: (with COMMENT)

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 22 August 2024 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7982AC19ECB9; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id On7b0Xysaeao; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0A6C18DBA9; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 47MA81kS008114; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:08:01 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB0746055; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:08:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06C84605D; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:08:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:08:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 47MA7xl4012398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:08:00 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Murray Kucherawy' <superuser@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <172430800855.2466060.224729296896523135@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
In-Reply-To: <172430800855.2466060.224729296896523135@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:08:00 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <050901daf47b$2ba1cdf0$82e569d0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQEyIIDX3guRYFyuDDeqegcNHxjWOrOEsj3g
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=ejI9zso9TW7WH5whNtpY2QAizE9HDf3r7FmxisrdjlE=; b=AZ1 P4Rf/MmZ1Yjt1rQSbRWP0/WR15vDDZiAGnV2EuoOQkc0gTAq65EyfkLvVE6gDMBk T2re86H3l1K+g/mYkyePV49f8nUDsMCP31PQTQQrMTD1MdVXCvNe2Vbsl8l93MIs +UXwlqILfmTGIAf2514OMaqzDGlbgHTIVqskRkOUmyGqpUPtlOpjW2GWazmrSZ1I 187D/uLiGR7mCC8XLz7YSYRHZPNUeKON3mP4ScgowB2/lD/MzkFeXJQ3kjdegrUR S7wNRs7KWLHOp48wARXhfcGd1Ug9cRpz5J8hk+YQ6ygv/fp3WEcfjyxobJaoFIOi PJcNyjlh5bXg/CIsDbg==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28352.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.360-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.360-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28352.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.360000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: L8tZF6zWW2rxIbpQ8BhdbIvefyp1glN0+8REZmSe4HgvfU/riSJXkW2k oeLQwPiFQIrDavfhGmz6yCBS8EWmUew0HgGvyMQFlVHM/F6YkvRpeZ1cXZibx+s/IVlBXKLmzKA CX7I5tE4Gz1/SaI9xJFFLvGMRv53E7GX0c1UlalxT3j6uyvUYPEpezIPA0eCPUnF0DMXqXvuHOA seoIzKqDcpQPJRxJ0f8PbYdWvfu1TBncJolKs1hrhXT+72mpTN7PYOv1sTRr2bKItl61J/ySKve Q4wmYdMDufcuwXQCJcLbigRnpKlKSPzRlrdFGDwYtmwLFgRykt7oQN0JRNmfdZNTgqI2VHG6Rpm DQylaPsf1/3a9+0pZA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Message-ID-Hash: FO44IJCSJQMHLEPLVBORDQUEA2JLYQ6B
X-Message-ID-Hash: FO44IJCSJQMHLEPLVBORDQUEA2JLYQ6B
X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, vbeeram@juniper.net
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: [Teas] Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/7GGv7rHhmxgFqVLiVdvpn_Csi_g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>

Good catch. Needs tidying as we talk several times about "ACTN managed infrastructure".

Will work out a fix.

A

-----Original Message-----
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: 22 August 2024 07:27
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org; vbeeram@juniper.net
Subject: [Teas] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 1.1 defines "Infrastructure Resources" but that term doesn't exist (at
least in that form) in this document.



_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list -- teas@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to teas-leave@ietf.org

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status