[Teas] Responses for LS on "Realization of Network Slices for 5G Networks Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies"

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 09 September 2024 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F54C169400; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 01:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W3M-2PaEHa-Z; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 01:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E220C14F682; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 01:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-718d962ad64so2580944b3a.0; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 01:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725869061; x=1726473861; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=42TV0D56HRqjAoAb0zbwu6DDitylQhu/I1MgsEK/Xpc=; b=BsQTf6itycQVGkGNx6oWX/gX9WU1eE6NjjVr/50//06pG0xRGWCODNUX6cC4yXWYjl 8jrXM3oilIgxlvYtdMlctv9kgr1xKLQS+Thr002HCztuM1eLvwLSn5LpO3EvXErRRo1F e8lXqYnplrBuOqVob69yETFgnuW42WsZFUAG6SH/zMobQboEbOBZOGvRotQk0d+Mzi/y AN42LBm5s00l3vFmRYYCxmNawJAETjsvm/eq1wW78gol/cTpZd6spkDSTNIX/tsEoLk+ w6waIJZRifYO4nIrWNqNZHz6ywyB1L12HXQ9aLT+54RG90tKNDzvXQuAwdBBN/sZSKio KFUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725869061; x=1726473861; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=42TV0D56HRqjAoAb0zbwu6DDitylQhu/I1MgsEK/Xpc=; b=aj/wWivhYulLLMuGcQ/hFVZH7F4uB/BnPPoQWQUqjt1kA3QvvifOeHRZvc4lJmoG5A XhLl5RalKymMV3PtzRBArHe4sps4fKtZMN5wQ5JT/FzunwtIFZ3i5Rog0QgzPxpsjI5L YoqbCWb+Hqhgi7ATDykYKYiaKv/9/4fzePZWxcKwcBCMkByZMyo89Df4Z35b3jMzW5Wt erxKw1LIRb+mB5Q1SIYk0XqIzFyMoYvpbKezo+qgKnBzKeOBea5wdzqTrWUyH5L+ATPR dmBQ6DBiH8Dtu/PYlb4gW0xpl36f24T3mO4a6z2oMwMvNXQf/hxWS87o2j71vszsOHXx idMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz5tOA8JJF/hbiMdPW2KKW1fW+vUJ95zAm1NafTnup+s/K+QtIC Aag2JdAvjUVqynFCNWfIv8O47qDWUOL5rfimJ/9S/Vw7yE6nvnEAbgAFIBcK8lVkkXZIeWo2u+5 DBYUp2EgUpsbuTeT91gesvbOUqNy/vaXw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFd+uZvZcPDmapEgIZt9Z0gai0e9/1+UE/h546BkbjYDCfxCeb98trmqjWMSsJ3zYZg9AYPL3twTssNXJHLl7Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:2d84:b0:1cf:337e:9920 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1cf337ecfd3mr8541025637.47.1725869061046; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 01:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 13:34:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsztTc9OQ3qCKyD3uGfjncLF5EvbabPOC9pDJMdu7YprQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000500eb30621ab341d"
Message-ID-Hash: HS5GE5GHIPIVVRM6I7DFA77GO2RBPURL
X-Message-ID-Hash: HS5GE5GHIPIVVRM6I7DFA77GO2RBPURL
X-MailFrom: vishnupavan@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Responses for LS on "Realization of Network Slices for 5G Networks Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies"
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/7QRTKEAGKoZLGppURR4kqKpQrR0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>

WG,



We sent a liaison statement [1] in June to multiple 3GPP groups seeking
feedback on our WG draft that discusses “Realization of Network Slices for
5G Networks Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies” [2].

We have received replies from 3GPP-TSGSA-SA2 [3], 3GPP-TSG-SA-WG5 [4] and
O3GPPTSGRAN3 [5]. We request the WG to review the feedback and chime in
with your thoughts/opinions.



The following is our (chairs’) interpretation of the feedback that was
received.



   - 3GPP-TSGSA-SA2:
      - Remove Appendices B.1 and B.2 and just have a reference to TS-23.501
      - No endorsement of the “Hand-off” options discussed in Section 4 and
      the QoS Mapping Realization Models in Section 5
         - This need not warrant any changes to Sections 4 and 5. We need
         to ensure that the language used in these two sections
doesn’t imply any
         endorsement by 3GPP.
      - 3GPP-TSG-SA-WG5:
      - Fix the reference to 3GPP TS 28.530
   - O3GPPTSGRAN3:
      - Inaccuracies exist in Appendix B.3. Suggest adding references to
      TS-38.300 and TS-38.401
         - In other words, this is a recommendation to remove Appendix B.3.



Based on the above, our recommendation is to remove Appendix B (including
the Transport Network specific sub-section) and add the suggested
references in the Introduction. The authors have published a new revision
(rev 10) with Appendix B removed. Please review the latest changes and let
us know if there are any comments/concerns.



Regards,

-Pavan and Oscar



[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1931/

[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls

[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1955/

[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1956/

[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1957/