Re: [Teas] Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Wed, 21 October 2015 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0724E1A8831; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpVu_fygr5qW; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A3F1A8734; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13786; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445451600; x=1446661200; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=0LfIvsgzB7cykFWOQtXTGrMn2Dj4r+sJwnVhKW8Gccc=; b=NLkjkTFFCUtS4CerPv83DhH5vySnhMfb91yerLATqcEjb3QNhicIwrDn CvlkdGja6xqeiCWIOBsPrDmPVxi43dF/3lNqpm5A+NctiWCkIzn/8Qn5V e2ls9s6r9bryk5LrZU8V9/KuYS815q9ic7oljNKQPrm09a+BEF5gtMmsN A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D6AQAh1ydW/4sNJK1dgmlNVG8Gvg4BDYFZIYV8AoFIOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqELgEBAQQtRwUQAgEIEQMBAQEoByERFAkIAgQBDQUIiBMDEg2/Tg2EZwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARiGd4R+glCBWhEBJgcTDQQGAQIEhCgFlicBhRiGEIFugV9Ig3eOPoNdg28BEQ4BAUKEA3IBhQI6gQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,178,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="42839184"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2015 18:19:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9LIJwF7017341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:19:58 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:19:38 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:19:38 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "ke-kumaki@kddi.com" <ke-kumaki@kddi.com>, "Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de" <Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>
Thread-Topic: Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording
Thread-Index: AQHRCN7nuUX7KHy5HEC9GJhelFxACZ5xw8kAgASEbUA=
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:19:38 +0000
Message-ID: <f76d23a0d7f1491e84a41f051d418266@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTswg0QAt09ADq+m_vEqcW6T0dKTcSot1uDdr82fC2SQ_Q@mail.gmail.com> <D2493E59.14EFB5%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2493E59.14EFB5%zali@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.48]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f76d23a0d7f1491e84a41f051d418266XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/7q8WmC4TL4OtzG5wGDStHxEbbpo>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:20:03 -0000

All,

I'm aware of the disclosed IPR that Zafar mentioned below. I'm not aware of anything else.

Cheers

Matt

From: Zafar Ali (zali)
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 12:20 PM
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; George Swallow (swallow) <swallow@cisco.com>; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) <cfilsfil@cisco.com>; Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>; ke-kumaki@kddi.com; Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de
Cc: teas@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording

Dear chairs and the WG:

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.

Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules, as follows:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2019/

Thanks

Regards ... Zafar

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>
Date: Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 9:22 AM
To: zali <zali@cisco.com<mailto:zali@cisco.com>>, "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com<mailto:swallow@cisco.com>>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com<mailto:cfilsfil@cisco.com>>, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com<mailto:mhartley@cisco.com>>, "ke-kumaki@kddi.com<mailto:ke-kumaki@kddi.com>" <ke-kumaki@kddi.com<mailto:ke-kumaki@kddi.com>>, "Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de<mailto:Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>" <Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de<mailto:Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>" <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>" <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording

Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

   If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

  If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
information, please see the RFCs listed above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
- TEAS WG Chairs

PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.