Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path

Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Mon, 11 May 2015 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCEA1A871F for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 02:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WzX56JLiMd0 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 02:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59AF1A1B5E for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 02:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=481; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1431335991; x=1432545591; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=606y2xRkfW05N2kKWO2z+yNTiaoFN7NOoA554mRgfnE=; b=fAqzCl3en4ABTnrKrFXJTHbqoMQ4xnJUy08L+mvDIKYLeNMo8t+6VTBV 2rEP9hQiRCieOzVNXrJ0GHT+AlQGOBmt9kSjNN4IRhW5BT8fwbtgC3Ux7 oIheeRpw8JvRnHtb+I6kkmXOwnP7ChfgQoDMfUrVfeZFgIO21+1aYD45y g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,405,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="491184330"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2015 09:19:49 +0000
Received: from [10.61.83.210] (ams3-vpn-dhcp5075.cisco.com [10.61.83.210]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4B9JmoO023275; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:19:48 GMT
Message-ID: <55507434.4040500@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:19:48 +0200
From: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvftt+FkZDqMM-65t87kVhQDzS38+4OoOe2v--fHvntqw@mail.gmail.com> <EB190B18-D189-4B5B-AED4-29677BC1B21D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB190B18-D189-4B5B-AED4-29677BC1B21D@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/8J0hZcqHuPvfiGyHz6KigOcH9LU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 May 2015 02:39:47 -0700
Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "<spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com>" <spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com>, "<dward@cisco.com>" <dward@cisco.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:19:52 -0000

I'm not aware of any IPR that applies on this draft.

IPR related to TLVs introduced in draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions 
and RFC7471 have been disclosed already in compliance with IPR rules.

Cheers,
Clarence

On 11-May-15 10:52, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
> I'm not aware of any IPR that applies on this draft.
>
> IPR related to TLVs introduced in draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions and RFC7471 have been disclosed already in compliance with IPR rules.