IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG I-D Status

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Thu, 23 April 2020 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D813A11D8; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x32bRzo2aRtk; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DBE3A0B3B; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id c16so4163661ilr.3; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RtDn8poof5KDdvXCOHQiUQLBHGBKdjdRylksW4mfgJM=; b=NLLNpyZ5zDuxlyBzVjCII3rTXr5eVNqMfDcXbrg1euW93a4jbqU9LAFdNzyQwvcHh6 adSJPqxv/5bR7DI7ZSBsZCZ4JczK3ZAQJRqklK8RnM8FINZBNBKBhQ0KjLASRptDprX4 y6GzXN2KaTOcOw3Cy1ORE/SzvbcB2xLP9qn2Q2GxXH6WPkiJxm0pk6gt4qfSZ4ktwbWD 2S1jigOe8aD67l97Z0aY2tpDpy+8FKpRQClK/hI6YpKE7anflgCBOofdB8Jzy39aXmq4 3EZOttnVHL6smN7J6DWr6GoTRaSSLcUHL3NuyzIoj0F/R2oFFCULajD80jh/LKCLwLKO Odew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RtDn8poof5KDdvXCOHQiUQLBHGBKdjdRylksW4mfgJM=; b=Nnv8SdReYsW4e445Oyev+rYvhlocz4zEvyqimg4v8oawnRL16tIp4V6ut4KPcT2sIK oUlXAlIaFu0Y4TN+WfQuSSvH8PJAiBMO2AnkmKlvBpRRxfUgj/znkQ84RxF4uNsdpd1W UwOFImt/T1sZfau7RVxgv6fYsCVab3QPrJUVZ2hxzNsWE+PjcPIaIfgT4o82ASl2OU03 qLKOMbaSQq29C8BDot1L5qPqPb46J/IFFBMrhdRwIlnul96nWhrcmIsf9SKV+dYIeivX 2nJlqfS8FsmjNk5fbA1LsytVtp/WGlFezIU56DHijO/mRKzvVWihj10Ax3cthMymPrMB JmQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZoqttpI61KZ0UhKVQG7cB8144WlTh6In2HicOZWJecT4RZhn32 R8V+raBIHgQ0B6AmKDasBEe36DkOu0Qj/j0lc0s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLsdlQa1mvxW8/Hd8Kpbje3tPwlvR+7L83KZRuIYkgbabSYmSeHEkde/2K70b3NySEzxOvTO9HAaeM3/06xzp8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d208:: with SMTP id y8mr1475553ily.1.1587611075394; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn78kAB3e2q+MNLtdskV9dmuBYP4iUhsHMJ_gQCq0AOXYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn78kAB3e2q+MNLtdskV9dmuBYP4iUhsHMJ_gQCq0AOXYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:04:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsGuosk0UzfZse9LvpOE6qiu0Sd3TP2KDsKZG_+ERYpUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030c14f05a3ec82d7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/8N3kegz3iNDxGdlI8nj2yWx8rA4>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG I-D Status
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 03:04:39 -0000

Dhruv, Hi!

Thanks for the status updates!
Please do send out a separate email to the list discussing the latest
changes to the TE Service-Mapping Yang model (mapping to the NM models).
Has there been any coordination/interaction with the authors of the L3/L2
NM models?

Regards,
-Pavan

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:38 AM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Chairs, WG,
>
> Please find the status -
>
> ==
>
> A Yang Data Model for VN Operation (draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-08)
> Updates:
>   Mainly YANG guidelines update
>   All earlier issues resolved
> Next Steps:
>   Yang Doctors Review
>
> ==
>
> YANG models for VN/TE Performance Monitoring Telemetry and Scaling
> Intent Autonomics (draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-02)
> Updates:
>   Mainly YANG guidelines update
> Next Step:
>   Solicit more reviews
>
> ==
>
> Traffic Engineering (TE) and Service Mapping Yang Model
> (draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-03)
> Updates:
>   Mapping to Network Yang Models added (L3NM and L2NM)
>   YANG guidelines update
> Question to the WG:
>   Is this the right place to include mapping to the network model as well?
>
> ==
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email