[Teas] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-15: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for
draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-controller-inter-work-15

Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is rather complex
and not too easy to read if you are not an expert in this field. I am therefore
trusting the responsible AD and the routing directorate for the correctness.

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points, and one nit.

Special thanks to Vishnu Pavan Beeram for the shepherd's detailed write-up
including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status.

I hope that this review helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

# COMMENTS (non-blocking)

## Section 2

It would help the reader if informative references were provided with
abbreviations (if applicable).

## Section 5.3

`notification of topology changes`, AFAIK restconf/netconf can also be used to
*provision* devices.

# NITS (non-blocking / cosmetic)

## IS-IS vs. ISIS

AFAIK, the usual way is to use "IS-IS".