Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-01

"Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com> Thu, 11 October 2018 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6660A130ED4 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Va9jmN8lTOdD for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C0E130ECF for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3606; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1539284385; x=1540493985; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=vWK9nJ4ATTB09k+ObZuNpPzN6HAfjzdSCigngha3ZU0=; b=S7n7G1r8futCwi+UcgDDM0pyylHgweF7Bci2UBQPPSs8G3r153bBMjdq 7FLxvuI/Cd0urunK02dKwqUFPMuH8dEcuOMhqzSnd257gYoUFzjM45igo B79IbzxqAGFATGsufZWfXMJ9aKVOKMn7NY/Zn/66cVLLk2/njdOdhE1Jd U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAABEnb9b/5RdJa1iGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgVQvZn8oCoNriBaMNoFoJYhyjg4UgWY?= =?us-ascii?q?LAQEYCwmEQAIXhD4hNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFOQEBAQEDAQEhEToGBQwEAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?IDgMDAQIDAiYCAgIfBgsVCAgCBAENBYMgAYFpAxUPpiiBLoQAAQGDNQ2CGIE?= =?us-ascii?q?LijoXgUE/gRInDBOCTIJWOgsBAYEuARIBJhAhAoJHMYImAohPlRMuCQKGUIZ?= =?us-ascii?q?hgyEXgU9LhCCJV4w0dIYyghECERSBJR04ZHFwFTsqAYJBCYsOhQgBNW8BgRW?= =?us-ascii?q?IYYEfAYEeAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,369,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="465173962"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Oct 2018 18:59:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9BIxPN9022483 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:59:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:59:25 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:59:24 -0400
From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "vbeeram@juniper.net" <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, "Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com" <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>, "leeyoung@huawei.com" <leeyoung@huawei.com>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-01
Thread-Index: AQHUYYjybur6uxTqQkWv8U9vpi5JG6UaZfsA
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:59:24 +0000
Message-ID: <6F109A6F-B8CA-4024-B951-F89C19B3F143@cisco.com>
References: <840a3b7c-8126-7a3c-af3f-1ee12bba0c9e@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <840a3b7c-8126-7a3c-af3f-1ee12bba0c9e@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.2.180910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <93B9B756E5DB7D408D130BA31B8764FE@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.160, xch-rtp-020.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/8PlV2E70GmZbNaGB-JYtatkBOFE>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:59:47 -0000

Hi Lou/all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Tarek

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:36 PM
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad@cisco.com>om>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>om>, "vbeeram@juniper.net" <vbeeram@juniper.net>et>, "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>om>, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>om>, "Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com" <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>om>, "leeyoung@huawei.com" <leeyoung@huawei.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-01

    
    Authors, Contributors, WG,
    
    As part of preparation for WG Last Call
    
    Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
    
    Please state either:
    
    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
    or
    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
    
    If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
    (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
    
    If yes to the above, please state either:
    
    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
    or
    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
    
    If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
    appropriate.
    
    If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
    above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
    aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
    stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
    contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
    TO LINES.
    
    If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
    as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
    the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
    aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
    participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
    undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
    and
    http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
    
    Thank you,
    TEAS WG Chairs
    
    PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
    response.
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Teas mailing list
    Teas@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas