Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 27 June 2016 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63E712D188 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Na2KmbJEBpRX for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FE0F12D122 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id a66so109691214wme.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=HkR98cA0g9hqmljL91e/A1cmbilyLQ71oNMcVW9udu0=; b=ImllgsmEPw3OfX2uuFfDhFpL66sdP6M73wCRG0zQynLS5lfUkhUnwupnu8sCRByiZ8 CGC9mMu63EsrvlKWGOIHLUW9BdQJ6VNq6osrTjcDYxIOn/fKdvcSbvszzOXx2+Yf95YO mhg2oFbCw0yFQDLwlJM2aL64gPa8x7ijxC6K+xcPAaxf9RfQPR2v/RJNzX8NcJtdPYh1 ZPjDbLMMSV0Jui8w1j6XShe8IFyfnfOSUlWAJqyqQ853zV2IitOfs7WkSguHQ7HzXBmn Xu+XaQMRzk/kg52Pt0UPDR1x6dWFucnAAe7HVZKPcOfBiB5VVCdQHLCk7ga0GGjWz7Mb VYfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=HkR98cA0g9hqmljL91e/A1cmbilyLQ71oNMcVW9udu0=; b=fYGu0PiGoYV6EUUYdUbCydhFXTDFExkH51zncTscGpofaPat+cO8T7mbPCHqDbTdvr XN9VqEFNZQmcHTjpMAFCf49gLhhHomBpEjm2N1wsJTNhOgn28kpW3OllVuLOGIuT8sVN 24G3l/QFI86olwqLeHNCj1/VvMf1jOFz8TKZiWVRtI5/dqUw6hfDZPV7De01UlgNY8hl bQ9WFm14N85ELBxohjTKi1p/tRY0zI2WR7nat/5foPc9xBljYNgzSCVEQP1M6Z71+V2o ayteVqn2tUcPmkcNas6y8ozoE5czqFBw7Nbw6AcNYY9FYHJ1dMbERyBRvJLUbUJj2ohH 1KxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJdi4OdEOwMFR8noAtPSDOcJWoY5rZpYcxfHUmUmM+YGYhWEMVK+TqQyX5xkS+I1g==
X-Received: by 10.194.80.106 with SMTP id q10mr183326wjx.155.1467025324505; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FIREFLY ([213.205.198.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t198sm11079077wmt.16.2016.06.27.04.02.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 04:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net>
From: <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Chao Zhou \(czhou\)'" <czhou@cisco.com>, "'Lou Berger'" <lberger@labn.net>, "'Adrian Farrel'" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "'Quintin zhao'" <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "'Lizhenbin'" <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, <chao.zhou@cisco.com>, "'Cyril Margaria'" <cmargaria@juniper.net>, <scheruathur@juniper.net>, <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, <IHussain@infinera.com>, <eric.wu@huawei.com>
References: <9853f7ca-795a-4261-5e3c-c95ecd4a9a98@labn.net> <D3968F38.1A425%czhou@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3968F38.1A425%czhou@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:02:06 +0100
Message-ID: <039301d1d063$58c80be0$0a5823a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQH9YgWFZPShFuX3gTbM6mnhrJPMNQHlDhC5n5baBNA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/8XSfR_v30IThCTZ1amiwdnBZ1KE>
Cc: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:02:09 -0000

Hi Lou, all. 

As a contributor to the I-D, I am also not aware of any IPR that applies to
this draft.

BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chao Zhou (czhou) [mailto:czhou@cisco.com] 
Sent: 27 June 2016 01:08
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>et>; Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>uk>;
Quintin zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>om>; Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>om>;
chao.zhou@cisco.com; Cyril Margaria <cmargaria@juniper.net>et>;
scheruathur@juniper.net; dhruv.dhody@huawei.com; daniel@olddog.co.uk;
IHussain@infinera.com; eric.wu@huawei.com
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

Hi Lou,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


Thanks.
-Chao

On 6/24/16, 8:42 PM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>
>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
>As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>Please state either:
>
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>or
>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>or
>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
>appropriate.
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the 
>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are 
>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next 
>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed 
>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S 
>TO LINES.
>
>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
>listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations 
>under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you 
>are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from 
>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your 
>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above 
>and 
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
>Thank you,
>TEAS WG Chairs
>
>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
>response.
>
>