Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity

"Ori Gerstel" <> Mon, 06 June 2016 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC9E12D13F for <>; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhG4-7swMNMi for <>; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA22C12D0BD for <>; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id n184so13413630wmn.1 for <>; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 22:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=u9oUhuLCo/R5UMO4z3l+CQ0ord7NX5rxwx/1IPmT/qA=; b=oUun/FDKrv3HoWGpmQIoXlH6LoavnfEfFMLKc4nNf+vv3FQZu+kfgI2Hfc5THs3m2A D85LLBDrwiEc4Rzj+gc/l2ntTt1qZhB5zSwfSwW7tbVeF3nnwMtA11CC+/iTpIrlXXRl 4KIJjslncW6Un5ektqEd7LUCdkdpMgGtJXCi3/9OfY5GGW5pDdneMpTm1BLTcxVtRU8Q WuYDNW8VwC53vShM1i5iilEyVEIN/NUkmfmeA306HkbX+BZ0tktzDmcsVnvoodWUuSmy D3WGU17Q/4X/I8NjP33kPWbiD5+BkGctDs4FcbvHGlaTE3cgvx8rn+fwUFu+PRKjBhuC e6Wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=u9oUhuLCo/R5UMO4z3l+CQ0ord7NX5rxwx/1IPmT/qA=; b=XCimoMys6/zUO3HCmaN1ajynKLtkjEjtMgXilti6wSxyAqg1gl/rlsnwR5/psJ90J8 O/4odWFGtMw4oDhjSR3fjj8ah5s8zi+YGj3aNS9B9D0Ce0091KZLzWmE2e1ZMPrQj3eX 7ol/DPN6Jz6KeN/T1ljMwemXz3/ceEZxU8jQHX5yHVQ1ZqnJ5cFIFosKI/21Tlf5Ge5B WApdX9q1i8OUw5qbawyuXUyL7YBvFbZrgUxbK90kfyqissESMZEX76S9AYdudnunGoCA OnwWP30BZw/8ASffbY1WHaGXf7kALn1t44JrK4GyS9xx8GD7OOCaBFr6y70OW2AiDa+W CsXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLs1t2pZMT0tEuFtfOeK/kvsBvvQ+j2ANhgrk6MtU0d1RWBaghjRwtbW/Zn6X9GWA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id x135mr2534607wme.48.1465189594354; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 22:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OriPC ( []) by with ESMTPSA id xw8sm5811745wjb.30.2016. (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Jun 2016 22:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ori Gerstel <>
To: "'Zafar Ali (zali)'" <>, 'Lou Berger' <>,,,,,, "'Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)'" <>,, "'Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)'" <>, "'Matt Hartley (mhartley)'" <>,,,,,,,,, "'George Swallow -X (swallow - CLEARPATH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT INC at Cisco)'" <>,, 'TEAS WG' <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:06:28 +0300
Message-ID: <026701d1bfb1$312267b0$93673710$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1257"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQGxiT+ZXNLsnhcFbalhAr9wlTlOdgKil9Z7oAc7B8A=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 05:06:38 -0000

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft

-----Original Message-----
From: Zafar Ali (zali) [] 
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 11:43 PM
To: Lou Berger <>;;;;;; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) <>;; Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)
<>;; Matt Hartley (mhartley)
George Swallow -X (swallow - CLEARPATH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT INC at Cisco)
<>;; TEAS WG <>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity

Hi Lou and the WG: 

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft². "Yes, the IPR has been
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules². The applicable IPR is


Regards Š Zafar

On 6/5/16, 1:52 PM, "Lou Berger" <> wrote:

>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>Please state either:
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>If yes to the above, please state either:
>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the 
>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are 
>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next 
>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed 
>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
>listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations 
>under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you 
>are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from 
>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your 
>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above 
>Thank you,
>TEAS WG Chairs
>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your