[Teas] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 04 July 2022 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE4DC14F74B for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 15:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.924
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vleL03x4Xtfi for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 15:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C4FC14F6EB for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 15:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com []) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 264M7Nr9016549 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 23:07:23 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992714604B for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 23:07:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CED04603D for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 23:07:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 23:07:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (93.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 264M7MZM002806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 23:07:23 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
References: <165697222560.27478.2338137252302838593@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <165697222560.27478.2338137252302838593@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 23:07:22 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <049301d88ff2$701ff5f0$505fe1d0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJ6xDUikB2z9j37yjU0p1ek/ZsZfKwqXC/Q
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.394-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.394-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--19.394000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: rXre1YwqJKK0upcqUpSkAdyBRU/cKn696FML6creK7lDoKPcRdYETS1s QGcqD7UtrpyextBSI2t1cgRJLEBdHK/Elphzpf1LLTHwnYOikQ1b0MaM9Tusz2sFfPqDo4B1t4H nMvmm7NLARsULoJDWybmaNWQHf2QaIgNa+7fxXLqjrlYm3WTU75hrfRzyBeoa2Qpm+FTHj9N1V0 N/6ncOciWQSYYFGzuMDufH6y1NjyXsZfRzVSVqXLhXT+72mpTNXWfFsWUHKW6DbVAVeaYamKPFj JEFr+olfeZdJ1XsoriRWsJTzzeWflOm2gN+nomsxEHRux+uk8jpP8tMOyYmaA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/9c--EKrl-2RtNk5TOw10-ebsX_0>
Subject: [Teas] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 22:07:27 -0000


We now have a small Appendix section to cover CR-LDP.

Does anyone else have a further proposal to address Don's comments or are we


-----Original Message-----
From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of
Sent: 04 July 2022 23:04
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic
        Author          : Adrian Farrel
  Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt
  Pages           : 97
  Date            : 2022-07-04

   This document describes the principles of traffic engineering (TE) in
   the Internet.  The document is intended to promote better
   understanding of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in IP
   networks and the networks that support IP networking, and to provide
   a common basis for the development of traffic engineering
   capabilities for the Internet.  The principles, architectures, and
   methodologies for performance evaluation and performance optimization
   of operational networks are also discussed.

   This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002.  This document
   obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text in
   line with best current practices for Internet traffic engineering and
   to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There is also an htmlized version available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at

I-D-Announce mailing list
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt