IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-wang-teas-pce-native-ip

Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com> Sun, 21 January 2018 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFEA126DEE; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:04:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z2Ll6wZK-ppC; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C29126DFF; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 07:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D97276A831585; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML505-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.115]) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.201.108.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:35 +0000
From: Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "wangaj.bri@chinatelecom.cn" <wangaj.bri@chinatelecom.cn>, Quintin zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, "kevinmi@tencent.com" <kevinmi@tencent.com>, "rmallya@juniper.net" <rmallya@juniper.net>, "peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn" <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-wang-teas-pce-native-ip
Thread-Index: AQHTkNt447sQ1oNI4Uy19cWTIQ5H96N+cDlA
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:35 +0000
Message-ID: <C7794D4A32C7D046B93DBCF0FA202C182E6C49DF@lhreml505-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTt6+WPw1JMR-5DYFiyJdry8BJ+HRM7Uyg==-hnUa1PHqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTt6+WPw1JMR-5DYFiyJdry8BJ+HRM7Uyg==-hnUa1PHqA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.128.167]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7794D4A32C7D046B93DBCF0FA202C182E6C49DFlhreml505mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/9dSfb_Mw2AXHM2qZhydEeUVY780>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-wang-teas-pce-native-ip
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 15:04:49 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

SY,
Boris

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 7:10 AM
To: wangaj.bri@chinatelecom.cn; Quintin zhao; Khasanov Boris; Huaimo Chen; kevinmi@tencent.com; rmallya@juniper.net; peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
Cc: TEAS WG; TEAS WG Chairs
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-wang-teas-pce-native-ip

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of preparation for WG Adoption

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email