Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition - Appendix

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364243A1486 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76k8T55I3KGg for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila1.tigertech.net (maila1.tigertech.net [208.80.4.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C344F3A1485 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila1.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BXg8s43Xhz4TFJY; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1597964413; bh=soLNN4h7jkeg37Z4H7PD5ThoVbA4+y122CfSIaiVfXM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AC7LGNX83xNHkajR+uOkIhNOgwQlPnGQlZK/y0twIwUN6OqJB9BgWVuM2SzXoebfk YXc+5QToJpI1LALl4yt+Z92BkwT+HFXM8b5egQjJ72hNqyh3LWsYlNFE0PU3jeFk4/ MeFfXnk36DXoLKwQBhFFKGim19zx4ijt82drQCRc=
X-Quarantine-ID: <D5dAYWZcGnrD>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a1.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila1.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BXg8r6NyHz4TDYp; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTvnv5nUZ6OYx9GkFUxDHxAFNvYsx5LrFfho3860_MLfZA@mail.gmail.com> <330a76d8-2f05-795f-42a6-01de094b54b4@joelhalpern.com> <BYAPR13MB2437D23542B163D477B583C8D95A0@BYAPR13MB2437.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <93726585-ccdd-3460-e6c6-540f98ec9084@joelhalpern.com> <BYAPR13MB243700523A1B5D597973C1CCD95A0@BYAPR13MB2437.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <2265a594-f48f-3903-d998-3bb764df627a@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 19:00:10 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR13MB243700523A1B5D597973C1CCD95A0@BYAPR13MB2437.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/9h1yUbbUVUPVe5_pZ1MfsP6vDj0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition - Appendix
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 23:00:15 -0000

Since I do not think that the material in the appendix is useful, I for 
one will not push for adding it to the Framework.  You are welcome to 
dabate adding it to the framework with the rest of the WG.  But it does 
not belong in the definitions draft.

Yours,
Joel

On 8/20/2020 5:20 PM, Kiran Makhijani wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> I am ok to remove some part from Appendix only if it is included in the framework first.
> 
> But for the TSRE, I have proposed clearer and shorter text that they are not visible to the consumer of a transport slices. One of the purpose of definitions document is 'define' common terminology in the scope of transport slices, and all we are saying is that when realizing a transport slice, things TSEs will map to are called TSREs.
> I am not able to see the drawback of saying so.
> 
> Thanks
> Kiran
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 1:19 PM
>> To: Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>om>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram
>> <vishnupavan@gmail.com>om>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
>>
>> No, your replies did not in any way address my concerns.
>>
>> I would suggest removing the references to TSRE and more importantly
>> removing appendix A.1, or at least the last part of the appendix.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Joel
>>
>> On 8/20/2020 2:54 PM, Kiran Makhijani wrote:
>>> Hi Joel,
>>> After having replied to your comments, we have not heard further if they
>> were convincing.
>>> Please let us know.
>>> Thanks
>>> Kiran
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 9:04 AM
>>>> To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>om>; TEAS WG
>>>> <teas@ietf.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption -
>>>> draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
>>>>
>>>> Without repairs to the issues I have raised on the email list, I do
>>>> not think this document should be adopted as a WG document.
>>>> We are close, but not quite there.
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Joel
>>>>
>>>> On 8/19/2020 11:50 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is start of a *three* week poll on making
>>>>> draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03 a TEAS working group
>>>> document.
>>>>> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
>>>>> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
>>>>> document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
>>>>> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>>>>>
>>>>> The poll ends September 9th (extra week to account for vacation season).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Pavan and Lou
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Teas mailing list
>>>>> Teas@ietf.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>>>>>
>>>>
>> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckiranm%40f
>>>> utur
>>>>>
>>>>
>> ewei.com%7Cf26ab959470747a36b2808d84459a351%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189
>>>> c753a1d
>>>>>
>>>>
>> 5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637334499094612048&amp;sdata=%2FGSlz2Q4%2B
>>>> RAlZTXBv5
>>>>> XlCZ9YKaUKQ7C4IUIgdQDVJ%2Bk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Teas mailing list
>>>> Teas@ietf.org
>>>>
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww
>>>> .i
>> etf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckiranm%40fu
>>>>
>> turewei.com%7Cf26ab959470747a36b2808d84459a351%7C0fee8ff2a3b2401
>>>>
>> 89c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637334499094612048&amp;sdata=%2FG
>>>>
>> Slz2Q4%2BRAlZTXBv5XlCZ9YKaUKQ7C4IUIgdQDVJ%2Bk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Teas mailing list
>>> Teas@ietf.org
>>>
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>>>
>> ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteas&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ckiranm%40f
>> utur
>>>
>> ewei.com%7C7bb861e35ac84653b62208d8454659ac%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189
>> c753a1d
>>>
>> 5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637335515772670726&amp;sdata=MZQKraVa8fj3BL
>> sLRq9T9a
>>> Ypp3C%2Bu1w9c7DgIVE6kE0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>