[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path

Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacalone@gmail.com> Tue, 09 June 2015 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer.giacalone@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094DF1B30D2 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7fotaIlYZXTH for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x243.google.com (mail-ie0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414D41B30B1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ierx19 with SMTP id x19so4013433ier.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=drIfkuW+nPR4S70CkxnGuRRPaAECKpBO7v1TMBeUKZw=; b=ns5OFN46Ew+d/dm4yyweCPwEI5VxKyjqcQPPA/lo0zUbBEmMXTg3jhX/AHYcC1W2Z0 Pk4wvpk8qtTu+yw2c9Kdh9VLf0cWaMd1xYwBOnaAOyIOmqSHCSAYU5SQY1BNiDBypEet AbPF3Z1zYMHxwWHsogiPbxSVtceB7Nv2aeHRykse99+ifXCNhIGdHacol3eVE955gAYw ZzuoOQqznqVdjiOsgrdnZHBXe6bviZuLMQSrCfUOtWa4tTDd16lDRDn2Uaw0Xc5PBrgo uCO5DiUXD36NHyrZ238m74l87YmF7U6aoXfEkh1b6biHDl9ph5udupAfOA+d2Op/NrD8 nhYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.132.70 with SMTP id os6mr879428igb.27.1433881583762; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.57.72 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:26:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAONEGYN5bkySp+Z+g_eTKvUM1gDU_FFHN3VzwO_VXWsMQwWjNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacalone@gmail.com>
To: vishnupavan@gmail.com, "<dward@cisco.com>" <dward@cisco.com>, "sprevidi@cisco.com" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "cfilsfil@cisco.com" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e42f27365bc05181b92d9
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/9x5pLb1_xgxBlX4RoUg9IybGAbw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:38:18 -0700
Cc: Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacalone@gmail.com>, Spencer <sgiacalo@amazon.com>, teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 20:26:26 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft



Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

   If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

  If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
information, please see the RFCs listed above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
 TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.