[Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 09 August 2024 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.52] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FBAC14F609; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.22.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172322405122.255490.10909933045876420270@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:20:51 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 55O53XNQT4B2INBN4USKJB2GZDTI2LN4
X-Message-ID-Hash: 55O53XNQT4B2INBN4USKJB2GZDTI2LN4
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Subject: [Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/AiK0gVHDFw14CKEl57Tq8I2WB4c>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Has Issues I have reviewed this document as part of the SEC area directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last-call comments Section 6, paragraph 4 highlights the customer's responsibility for end-to-end security, even when utilizing secure network slices as a service provided by their service providers. This raises several questions: - Does the document imply that customers should not trust the secure network slices offered by service providers? - It might be beneficial for the document to specify criteria or guidelines that customers can use to evaluate the security and integrity of secure network slices as a service. Providing such criteria would help customers make informed decisions and ensure they meet their security requirements. Thank you, Linda Dunbar
- [Teas] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- [Teas] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- [Teas] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Linda Dunbar
- [Teas] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel