[Teas] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094AF130DDF; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr@ietf.org, Vishnu Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, teas-chairs@ietf.org, vishnupavan@gmail.com, teas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.87.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154043513502.6899.3227532584938668994.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:38:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/B4Q_zUBCnZZuocUA3gDlfgtCzRc>
Subject: [Teas] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 02:38:55 -0000

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Ben's comment about the unconventional document structure. I'm not
an expert, but I think I understood the Introduction well enough to get through
it before needing to look at the terminology for precise meanings, and it does
seem odd compared to the vast majority of RFCs I've reviewed, so somewhat
disorienting for readers.