IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-01

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Mon, 28 November 2016 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302FD129F7C; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:16:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4k1WJ5m1guo5; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6519B129554; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CWE65469; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:16:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.175) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:16:52 +0000
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by dfweml701-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.175]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:16:50 -0800
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'Daniele Ceccarelli' <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-01
Thread-Index: AdJFby+06EuGJMdfR5C9V8d8uo588gB3DEEwAI1TUwAAAd14YAAXL4YAAA5IoPA=
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:16:49 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8E1236@dfweml501-mbx>
References: <035f01d2474e$a7bf9ee0$f73edca0$@olddog.co.uk> <AM2PR07MB0994F6A34D7CA79C4648FAC6F08A0@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8E10A4@dfweml501-mbx> <025701d249a1$d4e363c0$7eaa2b40$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <025701d249a1$d4e363c0$7eaa2b40$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.218.137.249]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.583C82A6.006C, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: b061c230d8bc9c278b3185dfb5fdf0d8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/BKReCB9sJZ9-yKZwmw1wUr_3xtk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:16:59 -0000

Hi Adrian,

Thanks. This helps understand your comments better. 

Best regards,
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 12:04 PM
To: Leeyoung; 'Daniele Ceccarelli'; teas@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-01

> I also thank you for your careful and useful review of the framework document.
> As Daniele committed for the revision, we will promptly make the 
> changes and have the list know what changes has been made.

Great. I have the Requirements draft open in my editor for a similar review.

> In regard to your comments on the APs/VNAPs, I have the same question 
> as Daniele's. Please clarify it. Thanks.

Correct document. I just fail to grasp the value of APs within the architecture.
They seem to sit on the boundary between a CE and PE and there is a 1:1 relationship between a CE-PE pair and an AP. 

But anyway, I don't think they harm anything.

Adrian
--
Support an author and your imagination.
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales.
More Tales from the Wood - Eighteen MORE new fairy tales.
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
Or buy from me direct.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email