[Teas] 答复: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10.txt

"Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Wed, 09 October 2019 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA001200FE; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 20:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0deQR5V4MoA; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 20:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (m176115.mail.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D081200F5; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 20:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WangajPC (unknown [219.142.69.77]) by m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 7F9CD661733; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:33:27 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, kaduk@mit.edu, evyncke@cisco.com, 'Alvaro Retana' <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, alissa@cooperw.in, rdd@cert.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com
Cc: teas@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
References: <157058858095.30443.12195158790275290959@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157058858095.30443.12195158790275290959@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:33:26 +0800
Message-ID: <005b01d57e52$503b76b0$f0b26410$@org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005C_01D57E95.5E5EB6B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdV+SmaFz0QY2F80Q1mGFRZ68a9V9gAADMZA
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZS1VKSUNLS0tJTkJIQkJPSk9ZV1koWU FKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQkOFx4IWUFZNTQpNjo3JCkuNz5ZBg++
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6OUk6EDo5EDlNGU4iNSwMMkkV Sy4wFCpVSlVKTkxLTkJJS0pISk1KVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxMWVdZCAFZQUlJQk9CNwY+
X-HM-Tid: 0a6dae9426b89373kuws7f9cd661733
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/BpYlzOoZTue12UDd7_fdk8PTU-Q>
Subject: [Teas] 答复: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 03:33:40 -0000

Hi, Folks:

 

We have updated the draft, try to resolve and respond the comments from experts review. The updated contents mainly are the followings:

+Add the description of the relationship between this draft and other two related drafts[in Section 1], which has been explained several times in previous responding mail.

+Add the description for Figure 1 to explain more clearly the CCDR scenario 3.1 [as Benjamin Kaduk commented ]

+Correlate accurately the link between the scenarios(3.1, 3.4) and the simulation results(4.4, 4.5).[as Romain Danyliw commented]

+Explain in more detail that the background of simulated topology and traffic matrix. [as Romain Danyliw commented]

+Add more description for the CCDR deployment consideration to let the reader has one overall viewpoint of the deployment. But the related information gathering method is out of scope of this document. [as Romain Danyliw commented]

+Add more contents for “Security Consideration” part. [as Alvaro Retana suggested].

+Reference explicitly to the published paper is added, which is from the same research group/project.

+Add description that ISIS is also suitable for this simulation comparison, because it also use Dijstra’s algorithm.[as Éric Vyncke commented]

+Some editorial nits are cleared. [as Benjamin Kaduk commented ]

 

Trying to using the XML2RFC v3 to include SVG format graph, but not succeed. Will try later when I am familiar with the new features.

 

Wish all the above updates can meet your concerns and comments for this draft.

Thanks again for your review. Wish to get your support for its publication.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

 

 

 

 

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: teas-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 internet-drafts@ietf.org
发送时间: 2019年10月9日 10:36
收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
抄送: teas@ietf.org
主题: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10.txt

 

 

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling WG of the IETF.

 

        Title           : Scenarios and Simulation Results of PCE in Native IP Network

        Authors         : Aijun Wang

                          Xiaohong Huang

                          Caixia Kou

                          Zhenqiang Li

                          Penghui Mi

         Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10.txt

         Pages           : 17

         Date            : 2019-10-08

 

Abstract:

   Requirements for providing the End to End(E2E) performance assurance

   are emerging within the service provider network.  While there are

   various technology solutions, there is no one solution which can

   fulfill these requirements for a native IP network.  One universal

   (E2E) solution which can cover both intra-domain and inter-domain

   scenarios is needed.

 

   One feasible E2E traffic engineering solution is the addition of

   central control in a native IP network.  This document describes

   various complex scenarios and simulation results when applying the

   Path Computation Element (PCE) in a native IP network.  This

   solution, referred to as Centralized Control Dynamic Routing (CCDR),

   integrates the advantage of using distributed protocols and the power

   of a centralized control technology.

 

 

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios/

 

There are also htmlized versions available at:

 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10

 

A diff from the previous version is available at:

 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-10

 

 

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

 

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

 <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

 

_______________________________________________

Teas mailing list

 <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> Teas@ietf.org

 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas