Re: [Teas] Status of WG drafts

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Fri, 22 July 2022 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0C8C15948F; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 02:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuAc782ggrkG; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 02:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DABCBC157B39; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 02:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Lq4K76nB4z67NsF; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:44:27 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi500015.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.92) by fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:46:18 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.110) by kwepemi500015.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:46:16 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) by kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:46:16 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Status of WG drafts
Thread-Index: AQHYmpgxxMCoxBgQ00KcWkxMdss3zK2KJeAQ
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:46:16 +0000
Message-ID: <02992e41292b4db0bbc755fba75c6ab2@huawei.com>
References: <CAB75xn7v+CJGZ5QfviPADQF5cjf=_qqdE--48__HTxKvsC1wew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7v+CJGZ5QfviPADQF5cjf=_qqdE--48__HTxKvsC1wew@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_02992e41292b4db0bbc755fba75c6ab2huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Bt2JaqphlKqyVutZY53zKLZqMNc>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status of WG drafts
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:46:25 -0000

Hi,

Please find the status of the following WG documents:


1.       draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn

No new revision since IETF 113.

The authors would like to solicit further WG review and feedbacks.

Next steps: produce a new revision then ask for WG LC.



2.       draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability

This document was adopted just before IETF 114,  -00 version was uploaded without content change.

Next steps: the authors will work on the comments received during adoption poll, and produce a new revision after IETF 114.

Best regards,
Jie (on behalf of the coauthors)

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 7:17 PM
To: TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org) <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Status of WG drafts

Hi,

Please find the status of the following WG drafts

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang/

Status -> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/190Fj_OQRjMgyjoaDcNp0ZZWstceAyE7BGA119-fGCBo/edit?usp=sharing

Also pasted below:

# VN YANG (draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-15)
* Changes in -15
    * Removed BCP 14 disclaimer as we were not using keywords like MUST, SHOULD…
    * Updated the position of the leaf “if-selected” for multi-src/multi-destination feature.
    * Fixed the mistake for multi-src/multi-dest example
    * JSON Example update
    * Editorial Changes
* Status
    * Early YANG Doctor review done by Andy Bierman
    * Getting Ready for WGLC
* Open Issues
    * JSON Example validation via tools
        * Passed for VN
        * Failed for Topology
            * Got some support from Aihua, Xufeng, Bin-Yeong Yoon to fix it

# Telemetry & Scaling (draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-09)
* Changes in -09
    * Clarification for “performance monitoring parameters”, telemetry and scaling intents
    * Reference to ‘Passive’ method as per Greg
    * leaf ‘threshold-value’ changed from string to union.
    * Changed ‘scale-op’ from identity to union
    * Removed ‘telemetry-id’, direct reference to tunnel by name
    * Added units in description for various identities
    * Added the description for the special value of “0” for various timers
    * Added Default
    * Editorial Changes
* Status
    * Early YANG Doctor review by Reshad Rahman
    * Getting Ready for WGLC
* Open Issues
    * XML Validation via tool
    * Can use some help from WG

# Service Mapping (draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11)
* Changes in -11
    * Removed reference to detnet
    * Used path-affinities grouping (instead of a new leaf color)
    * Shorter names in YANG
    * Added headend for SR Policy
    * Made a list for ltp
    * Updated Example
    * Editorial Changes
* Status
    * Early YANG Doctor review by Xufeng Liu
    * Blocked by SR Policy YANG
        * other imported models are making good progress
        * Wait or remove SR Policy from the model!

Thanks!
Dhruv (on behalf of my co-authors)