IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] teas-yang-te-types

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 06 May 2020 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB163A0890 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 02:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjcpfHMouyDg for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 02:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF903A088E for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 02:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw10.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.10]) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D921E0F19 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 03:58:45 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id WGpAjZkMrxgMWWGpAjICyJ; Wed, 06 May 2020 03:58:45 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=SIFsqtnH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10:nop_charset_1 a=sTwFKg_x9MkA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=HLvPDLHGFjgA:10:nop_election2020_name_subject a=voZKSeMjAAAA:8 a=ISTR18AOFi8LBbe1QGcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10:nop_charset_2 a=-RoEEKskQ1sA:10:nop_election2020_name_body a=9_PflfxPP4jfUBPIDKbT:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ugopzruiQnTk1vRUGpV2o6WRbi8qPtmhOFcjAxySZsk=; b=zg1wmhhsHacalRtvGn6zQ1GLcZ vJ4XitbymTmYr7mNh81fnMxx4s3gYcMtLYZQmoGQqnQvNhqQpj1mTHGckmUfmQAtVhdTaEYL7rZUE n7BMNxESmc9iVBaHgZmjDwzEG;
Received: from pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.11.201]:45456 helo=[11.5.0.140]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jWGpA-000zOx-Kb; Wed, 06 May 2020 03:58:44 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>, draft-teas-yang-te-types@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 05:58:46 -0400
Message-ID: <171e96c5ff0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5340CB4C7D59B225F7DD93B3A2A40@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAB75xn4UH2cZzNF48EP2L4n7tz=PoK94q2VBs9_wh=1BfTdzEA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB5340CB4C7D59B225F7DD93B3A2A40@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.23.0-1556 (build: 102300002)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 72.66.11.201
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1jWGpA-000zOx-Kb
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.5.0.140]) [72.66.11.201]:45456
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/C4OPLqZI5cGSbg4vFQ-WPKVItoQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] teas-yang-te-types
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 09:58:54 -0000

Tom

Nice catch - and thankfully there's still an opportunity to correct it!

Given the tooling infrastructure extracts the modules from the document's 
code sections, I'm not sure anything would actually fail due to this error, 
but the potential failures are certainly not a good thing - sounds like 
there's a new idnits feature here.

Authors,

Can you send the needed editorial changes  to IANA and the RFC Editor as 
well as to the list?

Thank you!

Lou


----------
On May 6, 2020 5:30:55 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:

> Lou
>
> I am looking at teas-yang-te-types-13 which is in the RFC-Editor queue and 
> I do not want to believe what I am seeing.
>
> The I-D contains two YANG modules and s.1.2 lists the modules and their 
> prefixes and these module names and prefixes appear in s.4; but when I get 
> to IANA Considerations, the prefix names are different.  The formatting is 
> such that the prefix names are well hidden but I cannot make them match the 
> modules.
>
> I can see this causing every TEAS YANG module to fail.
>
> Whoops.
>
> Tom Petch
> (who now ducks)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email