[Teas] What's the story? [Was: WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04]

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 17 September 2020 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5029E3A0E11; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yB9V8tc8PpBY; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6843A0E0F; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08HGrCfN017277; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:53:12 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B102203D; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:53:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5CD2203C; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:53:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.40.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 08HGrAJb011570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:53:10 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Lou Berger'" <lberger@labn.net>, "'TEAS WG'" <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:53:10 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <02c201d68d13$06bca650$1435f2f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdaNEwIQy2EehxeOSeGMPiZ8mpIZeg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.40.230
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25670.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.743-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--15.743-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25670.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--15.743100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: q10OwmTJkdppAsePrKSaJLKe1KMOtvrhTmb4S36qG993de2OoBqgwpN8 b9yoQuufzdj9O/6DAmWuLwBi2Xjqs2j1t8tcTt8vJP29N7gUd1BaEfFgComdj1Y9yet6QEd83kg rFxtA5NotqSgxTMFbYUgAAZdl5uIbaPyhlFfBMaj1WO1NzV/CYLe5OgQzJQdYCu/rtuDT4hNSSZ 2a0PApkeSXT/ru9uRZQE83gnQCnkCv1fP3II840ksh+mzT1UnbuoYFb0nRiqNtw+n+iKWyyCLyw WZ/CAIYmjLr5tFpiRcSrhkHUbAAmDZQQocM3TDMwrUhv0kAAvGS0Ed+8sr8mpsoi2XrUn/JyeMt MD9QOgAzDLM3gGacyXQdJ7XfU86ekGUtrowrXLg=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/CSLVmW4TdLCtJbtNcp-E9y9jfXc>
Subject: [Teas] What's the story? [Was: WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04]
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:53:17 -0000

Hi chairs,

Three data points:

1. This WG adoption poll ended 14th September
2. I can't see any responses to this poll (perhaps people changed the
subject line?)
3. Pavan's email about the adoption poll for
draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition says "Our (the chairs') intent is
for the definitions document to be rolled into the framework document after
both the documents get adopted" and "The TEAS WG will continue to discuss
and progress the framework for IETF support of network slicing"

How do we interpret all this?

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: 31 August 2020 13:55
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04

All,

This is start of a *two* week poll on making 
draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04 a TEAS working group document. Please 
send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". 
If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If 
yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see 
addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends September 14th.

Thank you,
Lou and Pavan

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas