Re: [Teas] [CCAMP] YANG prefix for Tunnel models (was RE: YANG prefix for flexi-grid (was RE: FW: Proposal for YANG model prefix naming))

Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 June 2021 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637E43A1D53; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.198, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIQOjJpiS0qI; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur04on0615.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe0d::615]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DE2A3A1D51; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VIpQlPd5z8rSZeV/UCEAfBAKpCJYvzVlSJP59ai+XzB6Dag/CW/yVtFjFTG59MnzZ1Ma0D9aQawpfRglRUkoeucKWsD20CZ4tL3uEjwAqhLAq79tgnYeCKFNezfUjazpgLl77e0oT6OgMxcrtPkBN4vu/edcvC5lyJqWzUZVZcUGcxSOgYqpmgG32xc1c4nw3SiaCuBwaqlhohRy14MedpIcRG9B+Ex35X0ih30Aoy+tgzR5hgzTDZYC43ZpN7o/Xm5TypEeHEkh7B80MknfTrxhFU4BVyZ5adAoFZZXCMjALtHqI6uuCIzpAHGRnPOxWlSpofUuSC7RcIEH97cv/A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kLTKXD9ZzlPEQzHHbNVAY7TzhX2mH2MX9TlYsoBednw=; b=gZpQusMp+AC64yeCCeUr4NOYSnwjkoKTX+bcmZODCjq6jmB5y2w2dICbTq8xNgKptRHlk1qoFhU5ENUX/hZyK7/qNUMtjXpVvzlg6KcC/tr/1YrpV9KnxWlSXoRfIkmXLtmX2PkZbBV61DemfhmKJ1CXW7B/uH26vVj50eIphslBXz6eqZEUxJgu9eBFiA2MyduPtjclqO+0/V90zn5PQ+WHnHVCr/cJrvlspbvxFhml6K9q+T91bxeu7LEmpLHjF3c1x8Z/4p0T4l+oSYl7ZkMA4Qu9W7D0B7m1NosSUfAJcPWjfDOKRI8cJ2xMcAG0AwIAglWdKeiR6IsZa0HKFg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kLTKXD9ZzlPEQzHHbNVAY7TzhX2mH2MX9TlYsoBednw=; b=OcmV0xRZX9Dj6vgR48m/oXJ+Q7M5aqt+LTUvrqfvNR6ZKySZJ4J6rkao3PykOuRXZXb+LjW+EJnT1Vqy3JXH4DO381gdCai+mWaepuw27luS8A+RCpaDtthfJGscfFyikkaxg7pMhuQdNMw1nuaoer7r+1OlrZLXBvEwCQEP8L8=
Received: from AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:32a::18) by AM8PR07MB8294.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:329::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4242.10; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:20:43 +0000
Received: from AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9447:d6fe:f718:662d]) by AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9447:d6fe:f718:662d%9]) with mapi id 15.20.4219.019; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:20:43 +0000
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] YANG prefix for Tunnel models (was RE: YANG prefix for flexi-grid (was RE: FW: Proposal for YANG model prefix naming))
Thread-Index: AQHXZ0YzyuXMkJGpqEWuJuOxnBQBpqsfv54g
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:20:43 +0000
Message-ID: <AM8PR07MB82959E8835E5971386C5FE4EF0099@AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <3eff922ce57b4c7caa7e546f82a4d8be@huawei.com> <AM7PR07MB6248C0D9C5755474F6144574A0099@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR07MB6248C0D9C5755474F6144574A0099@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: btconnect.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; btconnect.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 009045a0-3e65-41e5-a05e-08d9355f029e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM8PR07MB8294:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM8PR07MB82942D9A669C09A7D0B7E1C0F0099@AM8PR07MB8294.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(66446008)(2906002)(66946007)(53546011)(64756008)(186003)(66556008)(296002)(7696005)(76116006)(86362001)(66476007)(52536014)(44832011)(122000001)(9686003)(5660300002)(33656002)(316002)(110136005)(55016002)(8676002)(6506007)(966005)(30864003)(478600001)(38100700002)(26005)(83380400001)(8936002)(71200400001)(414714003)(473944003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?iso-8859-1?Q?atpcBw2A+fMkJ7d2t7ur+V5FJKSdehspuG7HKjZhVT7pDyEbuYTWhzVCwK?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?G870noBcHaDQZE6PW8vO14So2LCfbal7mXlx2mDQWofAWiFWRFzIpmkuPE?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?8+uLoxe780kLGiiJeX1FizAXHiDWyDz4ZFHbgLOmSyzHJj8Q2D4Sl+FkPQ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?fDq8s4XNCZVWAFGy9BWbmbmRykvbR6xFCAnmV3gBvPyoe+Gv56bX48WbrC?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ooGFUeGphqAYtA+G0jwSmsHckD45P97boUiO7GtsRYxOnSBHMm7zHT7XrV?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?FPPhE5UHkN52dpjcK4XZSNd3cxj9Q5Mhbn5b6s4hQNVq1z8Orms0OpOZer?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?+ltZ4Lpr2MdTfkzDzF/a7kdi8+qv2HvKmL0uULGPfjo+r6WLqopjodt629?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?MfmS0Udu76Q5WunzI5aYvxQDZPbelmEsuaEXowt06bRgzXdKQe5BWJdkis?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?XaxViNxUl0yVrw6lFFVyi7rCkYNrTU4zUbPoca93050Ycj+HYnZB/Nc/30?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?otQaDrxaZWFWhem5U2AtaISgvwC1T5qRGoAn9JNfX2wonBLhZfLRqtBDg3?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?cDNYmSu3ydUey58+vnlvlq9lAH7t2/amhla2QjRKPPAQdAFBAb5rgPCFlH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?HeLPFRZUgvAk77pS+uN71LC4e2j8xn0+tUeGc7kbZbrr/hyKpZaDl8K5HW?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?LN5TQdnrEVVi3OShhShYXQ6pWqKds21fl+gkuzxTWAT4wToT4Ir5uLQdNH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?OfXXBT5ul3a14V9vkaAdMv6F1MTU/sMO8SXX3MPmFouYNo4Y9MqO42PKyl?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ax2ZnTtZLg91tviPa2d/q/X3V+exnXiJ5ykWbL7aEfertYCyQcrjJgjI5Q?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?PBkPJgy1zuE4yf5HHh9rXcloBy2GdqzHoYjbZeJCyjkESMSV+2wF//sb1h?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?sHy/YTYRO7o+3G4Bo4uO0Vl3nSwJdq1itxfUpm+GeE8m+k3HWi5AsBE4Kf?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?07+ymBCu8WXGPtTOuodxESzoAbT6JMSUM9hYF48TCiVClZdvYCICrf2oXP?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?+o1ojQ4EBxqQk2ZF+LXMYyqhJXIe8WZ1rPxyvjBkhSBPmJAUGRNQNJYbWp?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?4Dy1JtlLdlo+uWLKf3jD4gR87FFvV/3ZE8fgP/iGEp49FwuJ3UHrkSGL9n?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?1rd6Torfw14gN7j2lor2QBrt+hXWr8zt7tgVCuV2BB+aJ5cGObVsQ70WCu?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?GVtueGtFdPyd9aXnv64orKBbbVSqrmNBohFrLkPlL/GsCeFwXPg2fADdIq?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?zIFGnpe/U2+LB1hhFeuEeKWsi7z6fkGSca7ixn9o4FdmLq4=3D?=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM8PR07MB8295.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 009045a0-3e65-41e5-a05e-08d9355f029e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2021 09:20:43.0914 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 7eUTUcw9S4Ypc8RHxUEfIDrSo7rdcxFm90kjGqg44heCtti9SsnuAgpOCHa2/CLWV3Upgn48pZIAaaMxSSRB4y322Efw+AEszPxSKvZBw2c=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM8PR07MB8294
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Ca019Jw4LW_MJvhO4qJa8VRL-pQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [CCAMP] YANG prefix for Tunnel models (was RE: YANG prefix for flexi-grid (was RE: FW: Proposal for YANG model prefix naming))
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:20:54 -0000

Hi all,

If adding one character is not a big issue I would suggest to go for -tnl, as -tn might cause ambiguity with a lot of other items, e.g. transport network, transit node, termination node...while the only thing I can think of for "tnl" is tunnel.
I would reject all the other options for the good reasons brought up by Tom.
BR
Daniele  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: den 22 juni 2021 11:08
> To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>om>; CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>;
> teas@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] YANG prefix for Tunnel models (was RE: YANG prefix for
> flexi-grid (was RE: FW: Proposal for YANG model prefix naming))
> 
> From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Italo Busi
> <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
> Sent: 21 June 2021 19:52
> 
> Let's continue the discussion about the prefix to be used for tunnel models,
> adding also TEAS WG since this discussion impact also the ietf-te model
> 
> There have been some negative comments from Tom against the current prefix
> (i.e., "te" which would also lead to "otn", "wson" and "flexg" in CCAMP tunnel
> models) which is broader than just the te-tunnel
> 
> The letter 't' is not possible because it has been already used for topology (i.e.,
> "tet", "otnt", "wsont", "flexgt")
> 
> The only option to abbreviate tunnel I have seen so far are tn or tnl with or
> without the hyphen: "tetn", "te-tn", "tetnl" or "te-tnl"
> 
> I have a slight preference for "te-tnl", which would lead to "otn-tnl", "wson-tnl"
> and "flexg-tnl" in CCAMP, but I am open to other opinions or better proposals
> 
> I have only a strong preference to close this issue as quickly as possible :)
> 
> Any other opinion or better suggestions?
> 
> <tp>
> I am losing track of the context, which modules are involved, but assuming it is
> WSON, OTN. FLEXG (MW?, DWDM?) then I would prefer  '-tn' to '-tnl'  as it is
> shorter  and to 'tn' as it is easier to read. 'tl' 'to' can be misread as 't1' 't0' in
> some typeface. ('tx' I often use but usually as transport or transmit not tunnel).
> 'tu' I reject because it is consonants that are wanted not vowels in such
> abbreviations,
> 
> There are plenty of other topo in TEAS but I do not know which if any will have a
> matching tunnel.
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> Italo
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tom petch [mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com]
> > Sent: giovedì 1 aprile 2021 17:40
> > To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>om>; CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] YANG prefix for flexi-grid (was RE: FW: Proposal
> > for YANG model prefix naming)
> >
> > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Italo Busi
> > <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
> > Sent: 31 March 2021 16:49
> >
> > It seems that addressing this issue on a step by step has worked well
> > for the topology models
> >
> > Let's then consider a second question/convention about the prefix to
> > use for flexi-grid YANG model
> >
> > I think that "flexi-grid" (which would lead to "flexi-gt" for
> > flexi-grid Topology) is a bit too long for a prefix
> >
> > I have not found any better option to shorten flexible other than
> > flexi or flex. I think f is really too short to be meaningful and fx
> > can be misunderstood as fixed as well
> >
> > Therefore, I think we can shorten it to either "flexig" or "flexg"
> > (which would lead to "flexigt" or "flexgt" respectively for flexi-grid
> > Topology)
> >
> > I have a slight preference for the latter option ("flexg" leading to
> > "flexgt" for flexi-grid Topology) but I am open to other opinions or
> > better proposals
> >
> > Any other opinion?
> >
> > <tp>
> > I prefer flexg of the options you suggest.
> >
> > There is something un-English about flexig, it just sounds wrong, and
> > flexigt is worse.
> >
> > (In passing, flex-g looks wrong to me with just one letter after the
> > hyphen, it needs two).
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> > Thanks, Italo
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: tom petch [mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com]
> > > Sent: lunedì 15 marzo 2021 13:00
> > > To: Daniele Ceccarelli
> > > <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>;
> > > CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] FW: Proposal for YANG model prefix naming
> > >
> > > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Daniele Ceccarelli
> > > <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> > > Sent: 11 March 2021 16:38
> > >
> > > as previously anticipated during the CCAMP session today, we will
> > > ask the RFC editor to update the YANG model prefix for the WSON
> > > topology to
> > "wsont".
> > >
> > > Many thanks for sharing your thoughts and participating to the discussion.
> > >
> > > <tp>
> > > I await the minutes with interest!
> > >
> > > Meanwhile ccamp-flexigrid-yang is plain wrong.  Under IANA it
> > > registers flexi- grid-topology whereas the when statements have
> > > tet-flexig which I would characterise as ugly and uglier!  And I
> > > seem to recall this is not my first post on the prefix in this I-D
> > > which clearly is not ready for Last Call:-(
> > >
> > > Tom Petch
> > >
> > >
> > > Daniele
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
> > > Sent: den 15 februari 2021 16:17
> > > To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>om>; Italo Busi
> > > <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>om>; 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>;
> > adrian@olddog.co.uk
> > > Cc: rkrejci@cesnet.cz
> > > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming
> > >
> > > Thanks for your feedback Tom.
> > >
> > > Working group, other opinions?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Daniele
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
> > > Sent: den 12 februari 2021 13:29
> > > To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>om>; Daniele Ceccarelli
> > > <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>om>; 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>;
> > > adrian@olddog.co.uk
> > > Cc: rkrejci@cesnet.cz
> > > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming
> > >
> > > From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
> > > Sent: 12 February 2021 09:02
> > >
> > > Thanks Daniele
> > >
> > > FYI: we are discussing these options also with TEAS experts:
> > >
> > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=d3d01972-8c4b2077-d3d059e9-
> > > 86959e472243-ddf7de26918206cd&q=1&e=586b5fcf-a971-4d25-81f3-
> > > 4c64316f0395&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftsaad-
> > > dev%2Fte%2Fissues%2F125
> > >
> > > Let's see if we can get an agreement at least for these two drafts
> > > which are in RFC queue:
> > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types
> > > > ietf-layer0-types (l0-types) --->(l0-types)
> > >
> > > I think we can agree with this prefix since all the proposals are aligned.
> > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang
> > > > ietf-wson-topology  (wson) --->(wson-topo)
> > >
> > > Here, I think we have two candidates: wson-topo and wsont
> > >
> > > I have a slight preference for wsont since it is aligned with tet
> > > and nt prefix conventions used in RFC8795 and RFC8345 but I can
> > > accept wson-topo (it could be seen as aligned with wson-tunnel or
> > > wson-tnl prefix
> > conventions).
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > <tp>
> > > Since TEAS already has its tanks on the lawn, I would go for wsont.
> > >
> > > Adrian expressed a preference for ...topo but I think that wrong as
> > > it gets too long IMHO as with ethtetopo or else eth-te-topo
> > >
> > > Tom Petch
> > > Italo
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com]
> > > > Sent: giovedì 4 febbraio 2021 09:14
> > > > To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>om>; 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>;
> > > > adrian@olddog.co.uk
> > > > Cc: rkrejci@cesnet.cz
> > > > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming
> > > >
> > > > Tom, Adrian, all,
> > > >
> > > > The L0 types and the WSON topology drafts are now on hold. We can
> > > > include them in the updated prefix naming.
> > > > The RFC editor will delay processing these documents until the
> > > > updated versions are available. The AD (John or Deborah) will need
> > > > to approve the changes.
> > > >
> > > > This will also affect the IANA registries, they have been informed as well.
> > > >
> > > > BR
> > > > Daniele
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tom petch
> > > > Sent: den 3 februari 2021 17:44
> > > > To: 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>; adrian@olddog.co.uk
> > > > Cc: rkrejci@cesnet.cz
> > > > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming
> > > >
> > > > From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> > > > Sent: 03 February 2021 12:12
> > > >
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > >> Proposal for YANG model prefix naming.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Radek and then Tom raised the issue of consistency in prefix
> > > > >> naming based
> > > > on
> > > > >> the fact that the TE topology model uses 'tet' and the TE
> > > > >> topology state model uses 'tet-s'
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that the starting point is a list of I-D/RFC and I see
> > > > > some
> > > > glitches in your list.
> > > > >
> > > > > draft-ietf-client-signal-yang probably should be
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-client-signal-yang
> > > >
> > > > Yes, typo.
> > > >
> > > > > I see two flexigrid I-D but you only list one
> > > >
> > > > I'm at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/documents/ looking at
> > > > extant WG documents.
> > > > Looks like draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-media-channel-yang expired
> > > > almost 6 months ago.
> > > >
> > > > > wson-yang and l1types have been approved by the IESG so I regard
> > > > > those as
> > > > fixed
> > > > > points that it is now too late to change and which we should
> > > > > build around
> > > >
> > > > Well, colour me confused.
> > > > I thought this whole thing came up in debate of the WSON YANG model.
> > > > If that debate is now closed, let's all move on and not worry
> > > > about any of this any more.
> > > >
> > > > > I have seen more than one wson model
> > > >
> > > > There's an information model in draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-iv-info, but
> > > > no data model.
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-tunnel-model expired almost 6 months ago
> > > >
> > > > > microwave seems to be missing
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-topo-yang expired almost 18 months ago
> > > >
> > > > <tp>
> > > >
> > > > Adrian,
> > > >
> > > > The progress of I-D in the routing area can be erratic.  The fact
> > > > that the IETF has expired the I-D does not mean that it will not
> > > > come back to life - a whole raft of I-D that were produced in a
> > > > rush just before the IETF meeting have just expired 6 months later
> > > > and some are now being resuscitated, others will be in future,
> > > > others will not.  Some re-appear
> > > years later when their time has come.
> > > >
> > > > To me, an expired draft says that someone was interested enough to
> > > > put in a lot of work and even if that work is not current, then it
> > > > would be a short- sighted naming convention, although well in
> > > > keeping with the traditions of the IETF, not to cater for such work in future.
> > > >
> > > > For myself, I like names that start with the most important
> > > > property and for me, that is WSON. OTN, RSVP and so on, and that
> > > > is the basis on which I reviewed them, and not the fact that they
> > > > are te - the rival proposal is for te to be the centre of the
> > > > universe around which everything revolves, regardless of which WG
> > > > - TEAS, CCAMP, ... -it
> > may be in.
> > > I am not a fan of this approach.
> > > >
> > > > Tom Petch
> > > >
> > > > CCAMP is currently working on plenty of YANG models, so it might
> > > > be worth stepping back and getting the prefixes consistent across
> > > > all of our
> > > work.
> > > > I'm not sure this is the most important thing on our list, and
> > > > perhaps it would be better to discuss the colour of the bike shed,
> > > > but to make sure that we do this just once, here is my attempt.
> > > >
> > > > My conclusion is that, although it would be nice to be consistent
> > > > with using just a suffix of 't' to indicate 'topology', this
> > > > becomes messy with some of the longer names, and it is clearer to always
> use 'topo'
> > > > (leaving the TE topology model as the odd one out).
> > > >
> > > > This proposal only extends to CCAMP YANG models, and I don't think
> > > > this list can debate the wider scoping of prefixes, but I think it
> > > > would extend well enough.
> > > >
> > > > The list shows...
> > > > Draftname
> > > > Modelname (currentprefix)--->(proposedprefix)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-client-signal-yang
> > > > ietf-eth-tran-service (ethtsvc)--->(etht-svc) ietf-eth-tran-types
> > > > (etht-types) ---
> > > > >(etht-types) ietf-trans-client-service (clntsvc) --->(tclnt-svc)
> > > > >ietf-trans-client-
> > > > svc-types (clntsvc-types) --->(tclnt-svc-types)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang
> > > > ietf-ext-xponder-wdm-if
> > > > (ietf-ext-xponder-wdm-if)--->(ext-xponder-wdm-if)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang
> > > > ietf-flexi-grid-topology (flexi-grid-topology)
> > > > --->(flexi-grid-topo)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang
> > > > ietf-l1csm (l1csm) --->(l1csm)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types
> > > > ietf-layer0-types (l0-types) --->(l0-types)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types
> > > > ietf-layer1-types (l1-types) --->(l1types)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang
> > > > ietf-optical-impairment-topology (optical-imp-topo)
> > > > --->(optical-imp-topo)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang
> > > > ietf-otn-topology (otntopo) --->(otn-topo)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-tunnel-model
> > > > ietf-otn-tunnel (otn-tunnel) --->(otn-tunnel)
> > > >
> > > > draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang
> > > > ietf-wson-topology  (wson) --->(wson-topo)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CCAMP mailing list
> > > > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> > > > =
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CCAMP mailing list
> > > > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CCAMP mailing list
> > > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CCAMP mailing list
> > > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp