Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp-te was Re: TEAS WG Document Status Reports

tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Thu, 07 May 2020 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3393A0B0B for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2020 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIn_DBamykvE for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2020 02:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr70110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.7.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5D13A0AF9 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2020 02:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Fk4qsvjdK6Glz5TRQzxCP3iJlAdFPI2zC9M/dgM/eT5Eu3Fc/OvxbDSHLVta3KxXEVfTfXedE+CQ1rTDjcXj3Ok7rRaALM4Ibab9AGoTuNp40I2ukuMWweZDGBTjPkBnHxxNwlfD7iO3we5NdeQRCniZVpj5YQihm44cimTmUBt9lILNFwb+mxGi+nho0qCUowyJSL4KY3mSroYA7bk2xe5aZDtsUo0EcovizhyLo5Qei3Vj2qf9fs7pSJaGW6mNxfkaCn7UsR8dOn4VO339uApNu1GqgvPo5ZfMaxOWXJhmtyjf2tEEPMG9sq8xnwbQioM+lxuUPwDeg9ZINBIO2w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DcLjgow7lqO5HBLJjvIPmFKtyK00c4bvtZjwirZSou0=; b=ap9Lb7cx9NN8fPTe/80cZwiTTQi7lLZ5+P/CLGuAmRlOpBzbL94mPPygxoAW5YXXdP26IDCkPHVmvxbZcL6QnAEby+DwMLyFCRx6BTFMorjf/UbSW8udNh44hKXyoeqmhEoIc5dBI2Zk9cZ8GGl5pdH3nvber0mt0F+Z9AZ+gRJncurQ1YZenHxwadNm72aH5XcTOVXchx/JR6dZVHYo+1N32mekjQjYzySlt/ZIYlgGsQJEBHnGSy61ybYlcalZL+VQNw94lLSt8HkWo6iAJDNgEqEv/9S9Eqq/FmLjtGxfZnmjBLY1+OoTq1K4qBotqarppHNufEC/2zEPdD2AYg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=DcLjgow7lqO5HBLJjvIPmFKtyK00c4bvtZjwirZSou0=; b=JFlsPxvmrWuYRjan3fNxhWp6XX9kX2Ik/gZdXAZ02zc/pQCBPRMlxWPy+puix9qKuTYkGhVE0n2ACT9dcMbxWHzo/hyCyNEtOwN9k/CT+tngKwGtEdv1EjgLRGCF8Sr79n2ia0qCTssuvadXF7sYTEaFRj2BKuCQxWTFmVkhZDw=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:69::25) by DB7PR07MB4683.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:5:34::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.22; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:42:51 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d73:b879:b380:bed4]) by DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d73:b879:b380:bed4%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2979.025; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:42:51 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: teas-yang-rsvp-te was Re: TEAS WG Document Status Reports
Thread-Index: AQHWGCVJ6p/yn6RKPE+rEEoBnq2R5Kia3GQTgAGVzDU=
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 09:42:51 +0000
Message-ID: <DB7PR07MB534028A7120CB9079E1CD9C2A2A50@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <B2787AE6-31CA-4DDA-88CC-7C3B6EF6B72F@juniper.net>, <DB7PR07MB53404B8B935FB6D0BE7180C9A2A40@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB53404B8B935FB6D0BE7180C9A2A40@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_ActionId=aef89fdd-ede3-4b72-bbf7-000001806389; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_SetDate=2020-04-21T21:07:20Z;
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.19]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e11d3d71-1baf-4235-55a0-08d7f26b0294
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4683:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB468310324371487B57B307BBA2A50@DB7PR07MB4683.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 03965EFC76
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(346002)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(33430700001)(64756008)(186003)(26005)(86362001)(2906002)(66446008)(7696005)(6506007)(66476007)(66556008)(8676002)(53546011)(91956017)(76116006)(478600001)(316002)(5660300002)(71200400001)(110136005)(33656002)(55016002)(9686003)(66946007)(8936002)(83280400001)(83320400001)(33440700001)(83290400001)(52536014)(83300400001)(83310400001)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e11d3d71-1baf-4235-55a0-08d7f26b0294
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 May 2020 09:42:51.3733 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: RHa2kN14FuaAAsTvHDZ9HwhSOcDZnmZg4o1Wq/Gs1OS4iFCP5uhOi/grpTSKStk5BXtcjwpIoJupde75FyxFhA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4683
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/R2yetQ-NzxDlWMaieNTkLzj1Vkw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp-te was Re: TEAS WG Document Status Reports
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 09:42:57 -0000

Ah, my mistake, I see that there is a -08 which addresses the changes in te-23.  I still get a sense of an unfinished look for this I-D such as 

augments /* to be added*/
empty augments
description XX

On a more detailed note
1.2 ietf-te-mpls-types is not something I am familiar with

2.1 I find the mix of some augments going up and some down confusing.  I find it clearer when augments point upwards

WG Chairs no longer go in contact

revision needs to be initial version when this I-D goes forward, for both modules

message identity I would have thought a better fit with base rsvp even if not used there else having to import rsvp-te when nothing to do with te

rsvp-te-interface-attributes
why does this empty container exist?

IANA Considerations
URI needs registrant contacts
prefix are not those that appear in the modules

Security Considerations is out of date; the current boilerplate includes RESTCONF

RFC2961, RFC3473 are reference by the YANG module but are not in the I-D References

Overall, I find the I-D hard to comprehend, partly because of the (chain of) augments, partly because of groupings within groupings with groupings within  ...

Tom Petch

________________________________________


From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Sent: 06 May 2020 10:19

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tarek Saad <tsaad=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 21 April 2020 22:39
Subject: [Teas] TEAS WG Document Status Reports

Hi WG,

Below is status reports for the below documents.

Regards,
Tarek (for the document co-authors)


1. draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-23
Current Status:

  *   Version -21 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments

  *   Authors addressed all comments in version -23 (already uploaded).
  *   Team meeting regularly to address open issues – tracked on https://github.com/tsaad-dev/te/issues
  *   Will publish new version -24 before asking for WGLC
Open Issues:
  *   None.
Next Steps:.

  *   Authors will followup with YANG Dr. to make sure no further comments
  *   Will request a Working Group Last Call after completing the above

2. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11
Current Status:

  *   Version -10 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments

  *   Authors published version -12 which addressed all outstanding comments
  *   Authors followed up with YANG Dr. reviewer on closing comments
Open Issues:

  *   None
Next Steps:

  *   Proceed to WGLC


3. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07
Current Status:

  *   Version -07 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments
Open Issues:

<tp>
Lots!

Tarek, this I-D needs quite a lot of work.

It relies on teas-yang-te and ;has a Normative Reference to -21; but we now have -23 which has turned everything upside down, like all references to p2p-primary-path have gone.  So I am not inclined to review this until this is updated to match -23.

In passing, 1.2 suggests other problems - I know of no te-mpls-types - and IANA Considerations is plain wrong to register rsvp.

Tom Petch
(who thinks he made need a synonym to

b
e allowed to continue posting to TEAS:-)
  *   Authors working on addressing YANG Dr. comments
Next Steps:

  *   Folllow-up with YANG Dr. reviewer to close on comments
  *   Proceed to WGLC after addressing

4. draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls
Current Status:

  *   Authors discussing augmentation of this module for MPLS-TP
  *   A new module and model is expected
Open Issues:

  *   Close on MPLS-TP modeling
Next Steps:

  *   Publish a new revision
  *   Ask for YANG Dr. review



_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas