Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp-te was Re: TEAS WG Document Status Reports

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

Ah, my mistake, I see that there is a -08 which addresses the changes in te-23.  I still get a sense of an unfinished look for this I-D such as 

augments /* to be added*/
empty augments
description XX

On a more detailed note
1.2 ietf-te-mpls-types is not something I am familiar with

2.1 I find the mix of some augments going up and some down confusing.  I find it clearer when augments point upwards

WG Chairs no longer go in contact

revision needs to be initial version when this I-D goes forward, for both modules

message identity I would have thought a better fit with base rsvp even if not used there else having to import rsvp-te when nothing to do with te

rsvp-te-interface-attributes
why does this empty container exist?

IANA Considerations
URI needs registrant contacts
prefix are not those that appear in the modules

Security Considerations is out of date; the current boilerplate includes RESTCONF

RFC2961, RFC3473 are reference by the YANG module but are not in the I-D References

Overall, I find the I-D hard to comprehend, partly because of the (chain of) augments, partly because of groupings within groupings with groupings within  ...

Tom Petch

________________________________________


From: Teas <[e-mail]> on behalf of tom petch <[e-mail]>
Sent: 06 May 2020 10:19

From: Teas <[e-mail]> on behalf of Tarek Saad <tsaad=[e-mail]>
Sent: 21 April 2020 22:39
Subject: [Teas] TEAS WG Document Status Reports

Hi WG,

Below is status reports for the below documents.

Regards,
Tarek (for the document co-authors)


1. draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-23
Current Status:

  *   Version -21 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments

  *   Authors addressed all comments in version -23 (already uploaded).
  *   Team meeting regularly to address open issues – tracked on https://github.com/tsaad-dev/te/issues
  *   Will publish new version -24 before asking for WGLC
Open Issues:
  *   None.
Next Steps:.

  *   Authors will followup with YANG Dr. to make sure no further comments
  *   Will request a Working Group Last Call after completing the above

2. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11
Current Status:

  *   Version -10 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments

  *   Authors published version -12 which addressed all outstanding comments
  *   Authors followed up with YANG Dr. reviewer on closing comments
Open Issues:

  *   None
Next Steps:

  *   Proceed to WGLC


3. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07
Current Status:

  *   Version -07 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments
Open Issues:

<tp>
Lots!

Tarek, this I-D needs quite a lot of work.

It relies on teas-yang-te and ;has a Normative Reference to -21; but we now have -23 which has turned everything upside down, like all references to p2p-primary-path have gone.  So I am not inclined to review this until this is updated to match -23.

In passing, 1.2 suggests other problems - I know of no te-mpls-types - and IANA Considerations is plain wrong to register rsvp.

Tom Petch
(who thinks he made need a synonym to

b
e allowed to continue posting to TEAS:-)
  *   Authors working on addressing YANG Dr. comments
Next Steps:

  *   Folllow-up with YANG Dr. reviewer to close on comments
  *   Proceed to WGLC after addressing

4. draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls
Current Status:

  *   Authors discussing augmentation of this module for MPLS-TP
  *   A new module and model is expected
Open Issues:

  *   Close on MPLS-TP modeling
Next Steps:

  *   Publish a new revision
  *   Ask for YANG Dr. review



_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas