IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 17 June 2015 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C471B2BCC for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wXE_livtMnwo for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939AD1B2C3F for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so153139674wig.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9rz7WfaAKsrsYHPwtgfhfEb3Fv1X2/Hy3ARu1Qhw6M8=; b=zWGliIf3ZNdGkxSJycLInRtUDukW+bcw4XStG2q64tsBJQPEgzc9t84Q9ltNYevLMy JNw2QNmZX4VSLxbM3TD0FV4SusTA0E+WyMTDDvUMPIAStxTPJWXLuNf/+55qlFXrSVf+ fqeFZXyw7KfpWrjGnCHOfLPSgHipvpWpO4j22uxNuq1fz2N/pxXptll04lVxd19bjfK8 q19xnJ5gSp3v+sVskPajPjpLI+ieposYBYVLQcxKk8KDaqT2MeZBF+Hfl3zvqtDERuGl bOQU2vzrmss1vluVFnv+QFzZqvgoHQ1fQ0en+rUXC/aRl2VUposVcADpkilBYi+N2XFJ oRsg==
X-Received: by 10.194.22.105 with SMTP id c9mr794886wjf.120.1434578169442; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.65.135 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTuVGLLpYHS32hNk+Yk2faP-EQCshw9nB_BdO8wYOQvF2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTuVGLLpYHS32hNk+Yk2faP-EQCshw9nB_BdO8wYOQvF2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:55:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2tnjbkmycKQ535f_+sOK0qstvR1-03ukAWBc6ihda8cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d978f3135af0518bdc2d0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/EM437_tUUyCcEsxzb5MSeCxeSns>
Cc: Vishnu Shukla <vishnu.shukla@verizon.com>, "Wilson, Brian J" <bwilson@appcomsci.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, George Clapp <clapp@research.att.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:56:24 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Cheers,
Andy

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>   Please state either:
>
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>    If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>   appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> - TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email