[Teas] [Errata Rejected] RFC9543 (7981)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 29 July 2024 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15EECC14F698; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 5CA5F3B873; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, je_drake@yahoo.com, rrokui@ciena.com, shunsuke.homma.ietf@gmail.com, kiran.ietf@gmail.com, luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240729150203.5CA5F3B873@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:02:03 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 6EQAT5WAJJ2ITLET5E7XWWCS6T7YNK3C
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6EQAT5WAJJ2ITLET5E7XWWCS6T7YNK3C
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: jgs@juniper.net, iesg@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] [Errata Rejected] RFC9543 (7981)
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ElMTWjWbnj_Xjb_yd8kIA0xUVqs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC9543, "A Framework for Network Slices in Networks Built from IETF Technologies". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7981 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: Mohamed BOUCADAIR <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Date Reported: 2024-06-11 Rejected by: John Scudder (IESG) Section: 4 Original Text ------------- IETF Network Slice: The realization of the service in the provider's network achieved by partitioning network resources and by applying certain tools and techniques within the network (see Sections 4.1 and 7). Corrected Text -------------- IETF Network Slice: The realization of the service in the provider's network achieved both by partitioning network resources and by applying certain tools and techniques within the network (see Sections 4.1 and 7). Notes ----- There is a confusion in the TEAS WG whether the "and" is to be interpreted as "both ..and" or "or". See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xejJJtuNtCeCZniUEhQkadb1i3k/ for more context. The NEW text makes the intent explicit. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Rejected per discussion on the teas list; see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/lb2QilbMlon5kXctsJV4TQ3swkw/ -------------------------------------- RFC9543 (draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-25) -------------------------------------- Title : A Framework for Network Slices in Networks Built from IETF Technologies Publication Date : March 2024 Author(s) : A. Farrel, Ed., J. Drake, Ed., R. Rokui, S. Homma, K. Makhijani, L. Contreras, J. Tantsura Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Teas] [Errata Rejected] RFC9543 (7981) RFC Errata System