IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] FW: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements-09.txt>

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Mon, 16 April 2018 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B40126FB3 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOb112FT9gsW for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E687912704A for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049458.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w3GJuYd8014034 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:05:23 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049458.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2hd2ce88ph-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:05:22 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3GK5MDq027065 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:05:22 -0400
Received: from zlp27128.vci.att.com (zlp27128.vci.att.com [135.66.87.50]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3GK5HQJ026930 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:05:17 -0400
Received: from zlp27128.vci.att.com (zlp27128.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp27128.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id F418140006B6 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:05:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.9.129.148]) by zlp27128.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id D9C3840006A1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:05:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.210]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:05:16 -0400
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements-09.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHT1btTvhTzpxNcykK3avFveL29jKQDzSOA
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:05:16 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8882C989C@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <152390785993.19620.11748402096888615624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152390785993.19620.11748402096888615624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.199.165]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-16_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804160170
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Ep3z1YP2QV8JkgDHK3Zuw0V6Nq0>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements-09.txt>
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:05:26 -0000

Hi,

In reviewing the actn-requirements and actn-framework, I found the actn-requirements to be difficult reading for anyone not associated with the teas work. It basically only has pointers to many other documents (use cases). The framework document only has one reference to it (section 7) which is to provide a reference for the term "multi-destination". So the framework document has no dependences on it.

This happens a lot - as documents evolve, they consume earlier documents. The earlier documents were important in the evolution, but have outlived their purpose. The framework document is very comprehensive and complete on itself.

I've talked with the authors and your chairs, they agree to put the actn-requirements in a "holding pattern" for now. The document can either be left to expire or, if determined that it is still needed, it can be revised.

I've started IETF Last Call on actn-framework.

Thanks,
Deborah


-----Original Message-----
From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 3:44 PM
To: draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <db3546@att.com>; vbeeram@juniper.net
Subject: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements-09.txt>

IESG state changed:

New State: AD is watching

(The previous state was Expert Review)

With the completion of the framework document, this document has served
its purpose as the content is consumed in the framework. The framework
document does not depend on it - it only references it one time. I recommend
not to publish it unless significant rework is done to add content. I've put it to
the state "AD is watching" which will allow the working group to determine if
there is an interest/need.

Datatracker URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dteas-2Dactn-2Drequirements_&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=6VAwNvkJQGRJKuR_6He9DyUhW6oo43hUm1qViVGyIlc&s=cF1_qwXlh4vIbfppA4Ijvg7t6l0iQlqoaN7wD5Wrif0&e=

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email