IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting: Notes/Observations

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Thu, 28 January 2016 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6421A0078; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qh2_1fkxLJSO; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BADE1A0015; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e6so31339063vkh.2; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NNGuhC3qk5mUEhuO9DsigSCrafHEDmJTEZGsV7wEueo=; b=DMvg5diu3cQhvC5I+zMFbQyt0sVCfimyJT45x4ZAg03ZAk1v2p4/x33nLlUDMbaKXH 3wqvsd7ChwnPcqBinUURmzNj7UbfHfjyyJKUo48J3KUUmv7p3tObVvm5JmayAAa/TZ++ 1CL3oep0zhS6e3MOL2mvRI7xVQN/6WzKBmRqsXmaGyrsAL6ak5Qjx198AhyJGX4csaa3 0K0EO7z7iUev9pZAi1pdBSotGw3DnpS0KpVf5ZhWDxd4+8FbV7psSRX/uke4cbJudain uc/m3kqCoD3xKEbWdQ71o4QQ6kOyil0epC5cvAy4zr+q9VR31Q5xH7mazNhZJC00TaxV SdeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NNGuhC3qk5mUEhuO9DsigSCrafHEDmJTEZGsV7wEueo=; b=KKD4Y3auC1l9DXnZl3Sh+dBjzDCD9AQHK9i+jbhJIOHR+J/84YW1OR2ZDgBsF5hRQI OfcyzGhN1eUtqRuHBHnaGx4YESfv/BVlG3MPUBUfuIAn8Q8U4IagF+lbajJvoaynbePL iACQxeJcw+kBd6KHEvg0qEIg+rNiTlbjRy95LF3ZvEAuYE2LNpRXfCqVDHoAilaTpCWO oW4Bq/3tfj/xaK90kR5WRCh+zHkY2XOGX322IAZ4I6IUJrmY4vhF0osKeh6tgU1TVIis W3S7jrdIT0znzv4PqPcTeubnDjMUt1fU0oSUWq1CQsZhXn7s8abGMOnaBNSh7v6ZyhH6 DI+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTN7D4oXP4setasB55ysm/tBYgNiEZH7lvzyTzrhT/CgdtTAudaletRBK7cMDo4Co1CezoF2ocoC42kLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.139.76 with SMTP id n73mr3597450vkd.78.1454015966284; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.81.195 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:19:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <01de01d15a10$4eccdb80$ec669280$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <CA+YzgTv_WHgO_sDrtUUm-T8NJUPq77hPSdSRpyoyNvDPvBSL=A@mail.gmail.com> <01de01d15a10$4eccdb80$ec669280$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:19:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsmE9tpeHoad6BeC04mPmRax0xkTHoZkBMf0uXy8SFVrg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142e71a2b1550052a6b7994"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/F1DbBFtjwTHJ8zuGLbvFV-mG4C8>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting: Notes/Observations
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:19:29 -0000

That would be ok. Getting the content right and discussed is the first
priority.

How long do you think it would take to get the initial rev out?

Regards,
-Pavan

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks, Pavan.
>
> > (1) There is an acknowledgement of a problem, but there was
> > also acknowledgement that the problem should be formally
> > documented. We request the authors put together a brief
> > addition to the draft summarizing the problem. Adrian Farrel
> > has agreed to work with the authors on this.
>
> Is it OK if we start by working on an informal (but rigorous) document
> that is not part of this I-D?
>
> I'd like to focus on getting this written down before worrying about
> format and presentation :-)
>
> Adrian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email