Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
"Chao Zhou (czhou)" <czhou@cisco.com> Tue, 23 May 2017 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <czhou@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2791294A3; Mon, 22 May 2017 18:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGXbzArRh6Kf; Mon, 22 May 2017 18:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E971294A2; Mon, 22 May 2017 18:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1495501564; x=1496711164; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=oTTdRRaRA7qhcng/JkkZ5wsPgifa/ylBpm2UQCJN6bY=; b=Z8kKJbcclxRxAPuEsbQmj/MorqeiDAuoSCcUR+jbk4LGoBMq8Tyt0bj5 RVnYpLTzzn5W5uyZ8+5rMiYrnLcVzBaUmifhH/LAMAy3IiHY2FSqqvQ7j bWBOAJej3K/coKrNriE5O1Fy8/WMdsWMFBe60+SMbP6z3Kq1Gj7mhouut s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsAACZiiNZ/5RdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgyorYoEMjgeaHIgXhTiCDyyFeAKEcz8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQZ0BRACAQg/ByERFBECBA4FigwDFQ6xToc5DYQAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYZfgV4rgnCCVIFgEgGDXYIxBZ1bOwGHHIcthFWCBVWEZ4oviy+JGAEPEDh/C3EVRhIBhCuCOHYBhnCCLgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,379,1491264000"; d="scan'208,217";a="428318518"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 May 2017 01:06:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (xch-rtp-006.cisco.com [64.101.220.146]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4N162xu010800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 May 2017 01:06:03 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-006.cisco.com (64.101.220.146) by XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (64.101.220.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:06:02 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-006.cisco.com ([64.101.220.146]) by XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com ([64.101.220.146]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 22 May 2017 21:06:02 -0400
From: "Chao Zhou (czhou)" <czhou@cisco.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
CC: "afarrel@juniper.net" <afarrel@juniper.net>, "quintin.zhao@huawei.com" <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "lizhenbin@huawei.com" <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "chao.zhou@cisco.com" <chao.zhou@cisco.com>, "cmargaria@juniper.net" <cmargaria@juniper.net>, "scheruathur@juniper.net" <scheruathur@juniper.net>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "ihussain@infinera.com" <ihussain@infinera.com>, Anurag Sharma <AnSharma@infinera.com>, "eric.wu@huawei.com" <eric.wu@huawei.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
Thread-Index: AQHS0z3c7In+sGeV8Eikd9zasJtBcqIBGwIh
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 01:06:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D094FD00-A9CE-4FDA-8E1C-33D192EC2E6D@cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvckqLVww7wQTVu6a==B_iG6=Fs5EX=3NbVNJyQOQp6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvckqLVww7wQTVu6a==B_iG6=Fs5EX=3NbVNJyQOQp6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D094FD00A9CE4FDA8E1C33D192EC2E6Dciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/FGDGcOQYoTbNTStB2xnsXNqwBi0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 01:06:06 -0000
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, -Chao On May 22, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, TEAS WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
- [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-centr… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Chao Zhou (czhou)
- [Teas] 答复: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Quintin zhao
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Iftekhar Hussain
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Cyril Margaria
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Sudhir Cheruathur
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… daniel
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Anurag Sharma
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… w2520n2520@sina.com
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-c… Khasanov Boris