[Teas] The elephant on the highway was Re: teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document Status Reports
tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Wed, 23 December 2020 10:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19293A0E95; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 02:43:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cijsvdb-_sUG; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 02:43:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr140118.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.14.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 611D63A0BF8; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 02:43:12 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=T3v2TjUDWwRjX5SjQRsiflLJLw7l5ghCH/QVpovdF1pnp0kIixQKUnQggOXrNUXqaFJosRNTLQj99thJH2HCcpel2ExxN14NEWhEF0EPJ7FFIVx0mmzh/qrKytihsal6zi15+I71vSx61PROClxTzRopJNek56UOrLevEX8ToSfFEwWgmx7AgfGB8UBE5GjEeWaNLVgpJXS+7wjSqAZAlAsOlPNwlPAJwH1ZHh36HZV8MJJMdc9+7a+tKa320mUFJxVV14WFwXP3frQgGA7mZjODXeKp8nUaMIOITw4584gpazuYRHa1YA0RWraFExKdBqnKOhKDI+yTNRC3BSQPQA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dk/bWUEq9NS9kbSNjQFTZaASHZpdURhAaHeYCvin498=; b=moThoNPVcR5u/MuyB4FjdqBW+1sLlJ0aGDmNdUeUb5XHt6qLGP2SudpcIgP0m+e5GErhzMmDRGUJ7JPwYULXehfOXpxg+Q2f1gdzmGNuylgdHLpqzLagrkeMRcWrIwfMob+XgWQmPFAitTzpD7y8c+jB34uTa7XidPWePq2NCXVk7+6G5LTX9otQ+F8+4Ff1Ysy1ZHIfYOyHA+MCosaqoBPiBCSJbq0/DoJNSvCiHzmhNCR/WZOGLGTKjgqZn0orPStFYjeQQmHGFNuOCk273Hx/7u00SdSz4LnOTmoiM4AiTPGvNEz+gjtiIeEuaVWaBEI3BymzdOB/3iIIdfaL0w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dk/bWUEq9NS9kbSNjQFTZaASHZpdURhAaHeYCvin498=; b=ElUi9Zs2qYr9BhZKCOQ3/LJBtCqrq0fZGQ/6fozdLOyHg5OCoY/iqfcdcjQiOT1MCIEo+Jg2/KpgJTbuyu5dH6BsvfmEsCwlUtQimLl68saSo2DRTBM885/q9ypuiUsKQ+1X+m0Li45ZLJb4srO2yCUt6eqDTjwjayyjKtxlM7I=
Received: from AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:95::29) by AM6PR07MB5240.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:3b::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3700.26; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:43:10 +0000
Received: from AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2c1e:7c35:41ed:9e88]) by AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2c1e:7c35:41ed:9e88%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3700.026; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:43:10 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: The elephant on the highway was Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document Status Reports
Thread-Index: AQHWGCVJ6p/yn6RKPE+rEEoBnq2R5Kke/8ZBgDmTrwCABT4e0YCoLLlW
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:43:10 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR07MB5784CEFA132ED260666FA396A2DE0@AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <B2787AE6-31CA-4DDA-88CC-7C3B6EF6B72F@juniper.net> <DB7PR07MB5340D7119E71B374A6E9D75CA2A70@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <DM5PR1901MB21509E29E0A9B13A45FE2325FC720@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <DB7PR07MB53406341349D4FCFD08A7399A2700@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <DM5PR1901MB2150E95EFE5266A9711036BCFC2D0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>, <DB7PR07MB5340F0E86ACB29B22A879302A2280@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5340F0E86ACB29B22A879302A2280@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: dd932d80-a37b-42fe-84a2-08d8a72f8ab7
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR07MB5240:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR07MB5240B9A196A9847861C84EBEA2DE0@AM6PR07MB5240.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:2399;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: S+09Qrb1QmwSXrVxhEy2lfbk2G4sOmQwi+67xtdfe21ckL4teSKKqnEV8ymgltIUWuaJhcwgZpkCQAfrEfJIDSKDwFbFqgueeHBCsZrwEbOYdoiNySF9PlmplbBvu92TX6m1JMJHGXi8Ep4DbNAL5HBB2Qu/Ve9DFQWK618SipN3b29lcdfZDuv11kdxTVo+iGzKS4GJizthbxjZWeW5sc6tmg+UyjC8RDjNYXf5VridI1RfhmyL0y4TAoLkiWMhTvj6+ynFY93Tg2lL27YJA9lNr6iG8U+XE/Ojh3PR4T45kPomtGr/YLn5xzsB99ENY23OByOaOJ8qQBP22MchZUBbFVaOjujRn5jY9YNUFtSnhsWHqt89pYKbmNgI/gxiM5yPxmHguIva73Zk/8+mfnCB5i7LJQctI6+u7xUg5FM7l//4lAWOdczSGtl+YA3wKeSsm+1z8Mpgiwy8D1gg1Q==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(64756008)(6506007)(71200400001)(9686003)(86362001)(52536014)(83380400001)(5660300002)(316002)(8936002)(66476007)(8676002)(7696005)(2906002)(478600001)(26005)(186003)(110136005)(33656002)(55016002)(91956017)(66446008)(966005)(76116006)(66556008)(66946007)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: badX7hob0k+s88PQZdfKsws25wds3wd+AkM1hgbLcJmckRFLeIbqMBOo18L9nbWeB1ZX+H9IE2WPF8a6atCCJznWGMVefPdwEoMCDKEd2I+96XDkkt+iOtx1wceSWLkPmJTjdoMOTod+6LPEwB1Mu7IRqOMTredN5D7LObaYzNXP0mzjcozMiNv5ii6geCmME9f2JFj2afhH+gcjAkhTOlyHxctBoYsLjcKfkjflY2EpE6AWj5/ZkjlRkDHgHr3m8jrqg75zfJ2DDtmDd9PwrBS1K/Pe/ChmFAtjLSI/66cTgowHKdM7iHvtBIVqNY/xI+heP5aRO0H7O/JWSLAcHNq5EG8x75PA5P1Q03+TXnrJatAXp46IIaHbV9pPgqq5qG7aK9TFk3P8TWzMoO2XY+f8+Q1CvLFcknsbC/4FX92jFuL/ezhy5nBRyJEyX9ZYwSN67sALq23uDmgCUVawsUXe9fy+DTYghJ6YaXmNQFYjVSuUqGKI/B48C7HZoqly0jl1wf4SvBpeXRP2DPWiqHg5jo/mGxH72+2Ca8THqZf810XW4fc7K00xtVnqn3HNZy7LI4PKiI1tdD6qWuYWATvLV0BEW+JPMrYGtWeqjATxfATW5FF+0Zrm/7rlFrfhwxc1QZE9ayR3mtFm9ZZ2ocr3yvV3OcsXh0TIUOkBgh6KVIj3Lg4C7q/R5eDVhUvMJRJTkZgdlKsEJcTAJ9HyPv63a9eMusjlFokseYttClVI1UftnkjRMoeUy0yKe3jXC4SBa1o/m0Sj9WHDbUw2U/83vJ8n7hdkRIHkxF/DLs7P6KDCJ/c4HsQ+ti9HZTOlhv51unJnLfhGY0q49+XTPGaXZmLGctKffnvfa0bbmxbS1BWrIl0k+uXDLKmtLbfw6/B4f+i1gxPHQoSG/3RimK9NFBN3Ut/rbxHaP4QYz2H9JXYtn3qWSbrp1WgCVr3htbgxr1/QRn7WLNT/9vKOvEdtdBvTgj3ZoFRR3aqWKW8=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dd932d80-a37b-42fe-84a2-08d8a72f8ab7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Dec 2020 10:43:10.4280 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +izUIUp6sWlje9vigjq05ADb6thUmRK3dGs9LFQAt+j6zWR4Kex4BrKAsqdF/tA0anqnYGAdb355D8QnVngs/g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB5240
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ziYkPfBOGVkJOLZfe0nELS61Xeg>
Subject: [Teas] The elephant on the highway was Re: teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document Status Reports
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:43:18 -0000
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Sent: 07 September 2020 11:56 From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Sent: 04 September 2020 03:19 <tp> ospf-yang has been in the RFC Editor queue for 484 days waiting for bfd-yang which is waiting for teas-yang-te which is waiting for teas-yang-rsvp which is waiting for ..... A mahout with a prod? Tom Petch Hi Tom, Thanks. We posted version -15 that addresses the new comments. Please see inline below. On 7/29/20, 7:13 AM, "tom petch" <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote: From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Sent: 27 July 2020 13:29 Hi Tom, Thanks for your review of ID: draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp and for the your comments. We have posted version https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-14 Which addresses those comments. <tp> Mostly :-) You still have a prefix mismatch beteen module and IANA. In passing, XPath should be XPath and not xpath But my main concern is that I struggle to understand what the model is trying to do; I can reverse engineer the YANG but would like more description to check against and this is especially true of the split between base and extended. The English is quirky and will need seeing to - the IESG are rather hot on this at present - and in at least one place seems wrong. s.3.2 'For example' well no it looks like the list of all the core model features not just examples thereof and the next sentence 'configuration for optional features that are not must for ...' is not English and I do not understand 'optional features'; what are they? I want a list of what is included in base and what extended adds. From the YANG it looks as if everything is in base and that extended adds the ability to configure those mandatory features, such as refresh reduction, and also to add statistics for them. So I want a description of what really is in base and what extended adds. In this context, the tree diagram for extended has two YANG augment that have no parallel in the extended module AFAICT. Seems apt somehow:-) Tom Petch <tp> Mostly:-) You still have a prefix mismatch between module and IANA. [TS]: I corrected the typo: OLD: prefix: rsvp-extendeed NEW: prefix: rsvp-extended I suspect you will get asked for examples at some stage s.3.1 The augments diagrams use 'o' to show augmentation. Other I-D use '>' but use it in different senses. My take is A----->B means A augments B. [TS]: OK, replaced 'o' with '>' 3.3 I think that filters need references. Subtree is 6241 but XPATH is probably 8639 since that specifies the context thereof which is not obvious. [TS]: I added the references above. Regards, Tarek Tom Petch Please see inline (look for TS) for more details. >>>>>>>>>> 2. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 Current Status: <tp> teas-yang-rsvp-12 would benefit from some tweaks Abstract confused me into thinking that the Extended model was elsewhere - I think that this needs an explicit mention. TS: revised abstract to address this. Introduction ditto. TS: revised Introduction to address this. Introduction should mention RFC7950 and RESTCONF Introduction should mention NMDA support TS: Addressed. 1 is wrong rt-type I am not familiar with but rt-types is in RFC8294 key-chain is RFC8177 TS: corrected. 2.4 lists two RPC but tree diagram lists three, one of which is authentication but authentication is a feature of extended not base - this confuses me TS: corrected and added the third. revision description should be 'Initial version' in both modules the rpc should probably be NACM default deny all TS: added. IANA Considerations URI lack registrant contact prefix are not those used in the modules TS: updated. Security alsocontrols TS: corrected. RFC5495 needs adding to I-D References TS: updated references. Again, thanks much for the comments. Regards, Tarek Tom Petch * Version -10 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments * Authors published version -12 which addressed all outstanding comments * Authors followed up with YANG Dr. reviewer on closing comments Open Issues: * None Next Steps: * Proceed to WGLC 3. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Current Status: * Version -07 was reviewed by YANG Dr. and received comments Open Issues: * Authors working on addressing YANG Dr. comments Next Steps: * Folllow-up with YANG Dr. reviewer to close on comments * Proceed to WGLC after addressing 4. draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls Current Status: * Authors discussing augmentation of this module for MPLS-TP * A new module and model is expected Open Issues: * Close on MPLS-TP modeling Next Steps: * Publish a new revision * Ask for YANG Dr. review _______________________________________________ Teas mailing list Teas@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas _______________________________________________ Teas mailing list Teas@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
- [Teas] TEAS WG Document Status Reports Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] TEAS WG Document Status Reports yang-te tom petch
- Re: [Teas] TEAS WG Document Status Reports yang-te tom petch
- [Teas] teas-yang-te wasRe: TEAS WG Document Statu… tom petch
- [Teas] yang-te-mpls wasRe: TEAS WG Document Statu… tom petch
- [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document Sta… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document… tom petch
- [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp-te was Re: TEAS WG Document… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp-te was Re: TEAS WG Docu… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-te wasRe: TEAS WG Document S… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document… tom petch
- [Teas] The elephant on the highway was Re: teas-y… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] teas-yang-rsvp wasRe: TEAS WG Document… Tarek Saad
- [Teas] TEAS WG Document Status Reports Tarek Saad