Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 15 May 2021 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA913A14BC; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.051
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.846, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJ2WH1_RWfKn; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FB23A14B8; Sat, 15 May 2021 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 14FHBTFS026885; Sat, 15 May 2021 18:11:29 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA2F22044; Sat, 15 May 2021 18:11:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E3322042; Sat, 15 May 2021 18:11:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (65.151.51.84.dyn.plus.net [84.51.151.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 14FHBSe0010865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 May 2021 18:11:28 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <161781991426.15865.4191431758501856588@ietfa.amsl.com> <06a201d72be3$8e1e9b20$aa5bd160$@olddog.co.uk> <2544_1620053359_60900D6F_2544_75_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035375DEC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <2544_1620053359_60900D6F_2544_75_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035375DEC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 18:11:27 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0c1301d749ad$58191e50$084b5af0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQHipGASW6xaEWNZaLDTKoBY1XfHxQIm5M9WAtxBG/eqpfae8A==
X-Originating-IP: 84.51.151.65
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-26160.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.721-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--16.721-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-26160.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--16.720600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: CxmI61mtwh9or4mPA3EMtnFPUrVDm6jtkYC3rjkUXRLe6dEbvIyrxYO3 X3IJL/YZcmVNewCyiCX/tVg7gnkzDqiOxU/6iw3IC4s/hE51YdVgFto/VVnNJVGlVPZ3X8UKFxP fMusXQ5bGndEtmY2ahIb5jniC4GrrtrZWHaNDZ4SyBjDX4sGuTQ73P4/aDCIF2TkH80s5O9yHOA seoIzKqO+3edRLkwQJE0r+lgPRJKhDQYe+1GQPNRQSKrt8gY5dDIJ2W9wBb2n0oGdwl+KBS0B32 ynv+GCSNqLkT46bLJOdqCCSnIX6zgAfSQYM343TOIQ9GP2P2u+ByxVkfd04JFAoBBK61Bhc25+o asVi/IvNEUXV/7/1z/ugCUkIEhUS/63r0U2g4ccSq+XFWzaAyttctKD34MoKRqoKkW7szeuxBn0 vaLdM0fCh8nvFeG1kZF1pLboQoEJas2u6zWFjgWsBfpoHMaplRealVAhocE9GMe+tDjQ3FrnOK3 QeyBoW2U/nUtz+rS9axBmt3miC4d9kiX1dVCYEfc7cX82yHHlDmn7kzuSuKTXSEULATMS5liFB7 cBUlY1D6sEb0kmvpJWy1LQeTSFjcRwy0PiTzUgdxBAG5/hkW8wx7VbZgGmKBGIAtDnYJ8KgrkHr 6pdTsFMyWiiNpa89YZTv8VKz0w9yQSrBguzobLlH8bL998dvFXeYTDvZ37QR34ro7k23nW5bGzF 5RLbqh285z27Kfv0VQqU6HZtHS3wwxS/qCrlePBWF0O0+23OS0Ed+8sr8mmmj1qXcLu1iSV6Cc+ vjAJ1m88CrqqNPtoz6aMLES9GuascFism0j4qeAiCmPx4NwGNn8XPiALIb0AUPEgVMzF8FdbsG+ ieXxwtuKBGekqUpIG4YlbCDECvS3Rxy14J4NwN5dASuJLL40y0rIBjPrc88K6EKxF//YEIIe4vI nxGQHIV02d1rpG8=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Fplj_q_jpTxQiUgpZVfCmmwfoaM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 17:11:39 -0000

Hi Med,

Thanks for all of your comments.

Nearly everything is accepted and included.

Not sure the best way to respond to your Word file, so I embedded my
responses and I'll send it to you under separate cover (no need to spam the
mailing list).

There'll be a -12 along soon to capture your improvements.

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> 
Sent: 03 May 2021 15:49
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; teas@ietf.org
Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt

Hi Adrian, all, 

FWIW, you may find some comments at:
* pdf:
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft-ietf-teas
-rfc3272bis-11-rev%20Med.pdf 
* doc:
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-ietf-teas-
rfc3272bis-11-rev%20Med.docx  

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Adrian Farrel
> Envoyé : mercredi 7 avril 2021 21:24
> À : teas@ietf.org
> Cc : 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
> Objet : Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt
> 
> With this version I have filled in the remaining TBDs:
> - small section on intent-based network
> - small section on multi-layer TE (thanks, Lou, for the suggestion)
> - change log from 3272
> 
> As far as I'm concerned this document is complete modulo review
> comments.
> 
> It *really* needs review, but I can't force you!
> Maybe you can look at the sections of special interest to you?
> Maybe the original Design Team could take another look?
> 
> Otherwise: time for WG last call?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 07 April 2021 19:25
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: teas@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
> Signaling WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic
> Engineering
>         Author          : Adrian Farrel
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt
> 	Pages           : 91
> 	Date            : 2021-04-07
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes the principles of traffic engineering (TE)
> in
>    the Internet.  The document is intended to promote better
>    understanding of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in IP
>    networks and the networks that support IP networking, and to
> provide
>    a common basis for the development of traffic engineering
>    capabilities for the Internet.  The principles, architectures, and
>    methodologies for performance evaluation and performance
> optimization
>    of operational networks are also discussed.
> 
>    This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002.  This
> document
>    obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text
> in
>    line with best current practices for Internet traffic engineering
> and
>    to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.