[Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F103A0F20 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PzeDDH5WdOa for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4413A0E5A for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id l17so6246066ilq.13 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bQNQnq2yZeUcJCddx8DVNw+GbvtXvn6IdkX/8VbJskU=; b=lAcf1PMNq4fMMtTxSQOFfKp3lAhvk0kXtr3wUcQ4++NAot5CjLBB/hxiov8LvMdJB7 h2iRc4ufzC+yJ8nsNTMqxPJBcKMYZi6hefT0mOaG82ToA9tLa+y7BkwGe1Si6hVf2QeJ Jljcp6ZtiIYXR9OIZGSInm0JL0uC9aDCACOpWQAJ+dvfmv/EXtALLZ1nK86GrDU+nEFt R/2iD9fy8hEDRVBUwSb2IM/pVJjQnJ/HqnY2BI1CnUeLEgZbNSarmuNv3IqTovrSb9Ob +mRyNAl2p0YFLb0/wsfu8LmVu9F3owDnIxLm/OzBfC6+bSRze7fJn/rMzhymFKa7fMc9 zH4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bQNQnq2yZeUcJCddx8DVNw+GbvtXvn6IdkX/8VbJskU=; b=SIkb9nPljhdVcrSvoA9i/JZgkW+AHgBF2EhFlleI34IxdRrW7Nh9fQENPt4w/g46ZZ r/Mi00rsplIFjtpKdpA8iP0+1InqpFB2rvCndyc64F2AKU1fyEKFZfI1SlB0Nzr3HMCH IMLSe+eNL5PZ8L7ttBlSh8NeM6KOHNCqfOZ/P6WbCJnIKRxYfBlY6YGLBxMXmMNdcqyK I72EOMrOzRFjyR5d/Ktcnf3Jh555PkJS9TFDo/7tlxspT3VqNyO7vNxa8nL7PAzuedNN d8a4Jx4s5UMLpYH/IkEhAyCPDAhalIuBceIOHKkToBb1TslcMPrsYwMZGguSpEgWVwzg BrVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PhoOgl5ayQu5J00k7yf9pE4duLN7hM/98i+D4HKBHhZrNIk1H ZrGcs9fBz6I5FyTZsM/o4htvliC+Wy0zcWLLmvvHRBBq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyA5GFSGgjClIqTTaH5p4tC7X0uRnA5TDZFaGwngssYcvlh3vARwWNuk9r4xoO764KViGGJ18eKXPOmnTaywwg=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:7f04:: with SMTP id a4mr8561586ild.10.1595948960110; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:09:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPRMPg5G2H2pVsOsxcaY8v0_URmL+aOWp4EgXs_K7+faxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d8dd6605ab81d2f0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/GeJq-VW0z5ZFDdETzF1mQ4vGry8>
Subject: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:09:36 -0000

Current Status:

  *  The updated revision -08 was posted on July 12, 2020:
     - Fixed the missing augmentation to /networks/network/network-types/
     - Addressed some review comments from Tom
  *  Received valuable comments from Tom Petch
  *  Corordinated with ietf-eth-te-topology and ietf-te-mpls-tp-topo
     for the augmentation to ietf-te-topology

Open Issues:

  *   Authors working on addressing Tom’s comments

Next Steps:

  *  Follow-up with Tom and resolve comments
  *  Welcome further reviews and suggestions.
  *  Working Group Last Call after completing the above.

Thanks,
- Xufeng