[Teas] Appendix A of draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation
Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Mon, 09 August 2021 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B26F3A079E for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 00:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGbVD4U7wfya for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 00:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D153A079A for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 00:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GjpKj2ZZBz6C9YN for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:55:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:56:05 +0200
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.008; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:56:05 +0200
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Appendix A of draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation
Thread-Index: AdeM9AMOUu4aaqmDRuyxMjT/xX1doQ==
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 07:56:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4f24480263374ca1866fe20518973758@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.88.158]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4f24480263374ca1866fe20518973758huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/HSVvh1vNZhh8-MzWu_NLsZyEqiw>
Subject: [Teas] Appendix A of draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 07:56:13 -0000
Appendix A provides information which has been quite valuable during TEAS WG discussion to justify the need to start working on a Path Computation RPC However, the current text of the appendix is not ready to be published in an RFC We believe that at this stage the value of appendix A is not worth the effort to maintain it through the RFC publication process Therefore it is proposed to remove appendix A before requesting WG LC Feedbacks/comments from the TEAS WG are appreciated about this proposal Sergio and Italo (on behalf of co-authors)