IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 08 December 2018 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF3130E63; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:38:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwiZnOZvzddw; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5869B130DE8; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 08:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id z9so3382670pfi.2; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 08:38:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+UPR+Ez+CnuqeFWrlaqWb46aIoaliX9eGvhrDaZQ1tQ=; b=gHSbqKgQik/p0MGXrSHl1hkTNKE7BiNH9RJjpbc9HcoexrowD5lC7LVye0XUssqrjK mQi0amKPIWzqVQn8YipfI5Zl64xisk0R/DrW2UdvWVZu/fmXDjfGKd+MWRNYHwkDCeBx D7W9H72fURWrBpqjBiSKiqxeV/xv2UnweMPop9mAYyAowCq1BICM6K+SGwk6bf0umcTG zK9rgDD1jQDNNY/APOppOsdlbwy4AbuLSbqiUjsZkX7qFGDPGZGCCxz+/6MSZdodbjK2 wGNfP5Fw0c+zeSNY3fXcsONSVvwXDMzIqzq6V+oZxmo5g7Um8G39Pp4a9WwBO9MUntgk YN0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+UPR+Ez+CnuqeFWrlaqWb46aIoaliX9eGvhrDaZQ1tQ=; b=gechZ8fZpwLL1kEEpBZS+Ds6rweOz9lgIjgPPv3RYt0hml39MTnHqoOR8UHT8pACYQ nndgWeVDWOR66p37QdA555XCaL+Ayv9oX79wCerjA/02MsrHYnSxwSjhg9E9UY1JAIDi vGUO+g9bVwRHR659105GChleXbMyR5PUMVjwEKjcX/yfuMeZSY5RRBh1i0imtU9vvtVf cDczL6W/3I7QDVOFGXgL25HPszpxc/62Mcu+TO+d0kMgNwdWJ3Y4pHrcZvwZeqGX884Y bUU+a6pq9EYof1ER+AUrGRfDSmLaOxCRkWuHOQ2W1iPvrF+fZwwzeKLbcMZ9nVex9x8J V6wA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZrF6SnMTeislNDekds09ZcJukQyJJ9vmqFhscegcihEIDU0t/7 mBOBxMuErWtuHS8B6B5eimhVIWYxdtDHvHEsR4g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XfonV91gwpbQwYAxkpdHjLZDDL/0i8nmkIXbHto8YFnbOS2EBSOE/lK8XorsDRbYRvMv9NL8jD+RpsPmP5kz8=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:9c1a:: with SMTP id f26mr5640348pge.381.1544287114851; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 08:38:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 11:38:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTs35C8qrjdjcQ0fboZJORDpENVjAL5uo38fVc-Y5kUp=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: hejia@huawei.com, Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e9779f057c855cbe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/HmnoD_NCcFDBgdt7Xs1WJbK6rc8>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 16:38:38 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of preparation for WG Adoption

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email