[Teas] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation-11

daniel@olddog.co.uk Thu, 24 October 2024 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF11C151068 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVEepHjZuMLh for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4ACEC14F6F2 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43152b79d25so8410475e9.1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1729774008; x=1730378808; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GHRu94FXNyTzXleoP2Usjg9fI7Ls81FWdfR+A+gItr0=; b=cyRLCSX15qZEdHgcPNYrjmc7vTGjT8mAHHKYtbFrltbYfNkiZbdvhrcsa2s24Orlad 6XB5iBXAp6wzRLvbNQiq/MISFy5HeJ284T5lXFpgAffEfLz86Lya2eubPj6t5e4iWcCG DxG4SiOFdCFiJvUZuslWOxj/Y8jkXmLRMCA1IEHdcQoikqxRy0VccPYxyzDQ9jeVqAel TGomq+yaCWp/zFXdqa7pSm5FN3XEHDGlONtbgnsi9zMEiI+sD4D34gRhLMb2oBO4sBFh wXBZKfJgwtAXZLRldk1BNtwYsW6AKsOXlSEgGnHQYYWLax7lnvu3uTfYNiKtCiT8S96A LEcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729774008; x=1730378808; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GHRu94FXNyTzXleoP2Usjg9fI7Ls81FWdfR+A+gItr0=; b=TI5wotnuP/AI2pFXN4rmmyvUYpE5+INxE8kyHLj80l1Js/Wlga4hnzXwcAyVPTOr9R RUxriE+PZmLvzwpw6blrecrjQnrgWuTAVc2bLNCRxxrRG5lSo2wkxpu/w+N7ekkBGCDS EkRhO0ecBu7q+4DakvFRuQHBpycz88Lsxx3LLR8iOssdQCdk4SCw7bqu7gVJGKzHX2x5 xbFWYLRJI5HCDN/z7vSJ6+psE+JbSKSe5nNmAb+RzJBmPXWjBICEvXznuioWJrN5wWwr zy4fZLLLAx5laf7bDyDssWh8ImN4nxTRJClMKAXa2GPhpfouigK1PmNX17CSL0MoW/JR +YiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwC9ugzdN0mRhKA8a9SSKJNo4YPZahXM/VEWJQnt6D+TnKUVM9J 9db1fICBxKK/pQUkH8SDxWXnyTLT9d4pYSz+cBond/4M7Sy0v4YqF4CAwd+P3A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGibERL6DUuMOl3DFqwslA1b2IUE8rHMtcs1OLWJi+1M9NH1BJ82pe3t1fuNd6fOhezTBQaSw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35cd:b0:430:52ec:1e41 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4318415c0acmr57653295e9.17.1729774007452; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CIPHER ([2a00:23c7:115:2301:8dc6:3070:9e35:1d79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-37ee0a37b5asm11186137f8f.10.2024.10.24.05.46.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Oct 2024 05:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: "'Samier Barguil Giraldo (Nokia)'" <samier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com>, 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "'luismiguel.contrerasmurillo'" <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>, "'Victor Lopez (Nokia)'" <victor.lopez@nokia.com>, 'Oscar Gonzalez De Dios' <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, 'Daniel King' <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "'Rokui, Reza'" <rrokui@ciena.com>
References: <CA+YzgTv2CZuCz68VSgXTqE2b_yQ6mf+8DMhb0M57B+Y8TfRWkA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB40898ADC5CE66E0066B0554BBB4E2@DB7PR07MB4089.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB40898ADC5CE66E0066B0554BBB4E2@DB7PR07MB4089.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:46:45 +0100
Message-ID: <05f801db2612$c8f703e0$5ae50ba0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_05F9_01DB261B.2ABC0820"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIzBZAk1x+OGCNyC0f3h5+to1b/ogFrmwHWsdq9dlA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Message-ID-Hash: 6SGFOV3NG52GL5DUP6RI6YCXB24QW2T7
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6SGFOV3NG52GL5DUP6RI6YCXB24QW2T7
X-MailFrom: dk@danielking.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>, 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation-11
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Hwceff2Ul5PK76smhmiCNewOoaQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>

Hi All, 

 

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

 

BR, Dan. 

 

From: Samier Barguil Giraldo (Nokia) <samier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com> 
Sent: 24 October 2024 13:21
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; luismiguel.contrerasmurillo
<luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>; Victor Lopez (Nokia)
<victor.lopez@nokia.com>; Oscar Gonzalez De Dios
<oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>; mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Daniel
King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>; Rokui, Reza <rrokui@ciena.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on
draft-barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation-11

 

Dear Vishnu and WG, 

 

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

 

Samier Barguil

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com
<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com> > 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2024 2:14 PM
To: Samier Barguil Giraldo (Nokia) <samier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com
<mailto:samier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com> >; luismiguel.contrerasmurillo
<luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com
<mailto:luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com> >; Victor Lopez (Nokia)
<victor.lopez@nokia.com <mailto:victor.lopez@nokia.com> >; Oscar Gonzalez De
Dios <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
<mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com> >; mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> ; Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk
<mailto:daniel@olddog.co.uk> >; Rokui, Reza <rrokui@ciena.com
<mailto:rrokui@ciena.com> >
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org> >; TEAS WG Chairs
<teas-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org> >
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation-11

 


 

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking
links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional
information.

 

Authors, Contributors, WG,

In preparation for WG Adoption

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of
whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author.

NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
https://www.ietf.org/standards/ <https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/> ipr/

Thank you,
Pavan (as co-chair)

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.