Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 20 April 2020 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6EC3A1284 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjBigaWWWhFi for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CAC3A127E for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id t10so11638501ilg.9 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gh7Up997GuUP02a2CxfCBfSw9PDTOuzAwAWHMs5W4Ns=; b=JVlxMtViNmMYFT8h1oVqC8tOE4i6sWYm8W5/WDRK3Vis4vGscxEUDtTFcR7X28Echv Ygal21vp3rtglEitvLufNPkPMew4v+q6VB4+ZtwSIsGFWZ1YEbmtpL7OGzMIimlqH/Fi LK6wKygNcVOB+3Vwoe113kl6bqnnpzIn7bDCYwat4TAuaQ2DRRsRvOl6haNRj1LeNf9o IUnPopwjmqGCs4VECJaYafU2tqVO6x3Z9YVPdzF+u4bc4vzY7ybGeJQ5O0UTWjB5UyaH flSTwmeF4LH0L6SIMSkn5B7rhg2MbxqDbgCJ5GW/P33CkmsRy5pFyX6/vQ0Q6qG0FzVT aOQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gh7Up997GuUP02a2CxfCBfSw9PDTOuzAwAWHMs5W4Ns=; b=VQAehcNjS7+JiLDIrNTv7WYMAzNaw0zou+RLIk8x33lD7Pl/pDuKm2jdjWewKRB12u pF8L2Yco9MsCT6b/Va/4+Ee4r6XD3Gx9NmLaUQ3c3JhGKSpdADqFkkYrfKblh/JOD05F Ce7e8HyJalgzduw4yUYt/nNbKoSRIl7TN9Pb+Q+634luR3WUy5Ekniud1SKLINxe/Hfa PRNiUMWZ5wFZuIMzKLFpiKmmonZ88bZ1KebUqslDS8jD8eHTrzXI2qn/83N62qdpGZ7j PpKpse3r2ZEXOOhdH2rtr20Bd2ab89D7IlI2wYW0NHrK+jimm0Po89ReshtT7AL+oqQ8 hiew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY4iKi/vKWgwaxqjcTb8/g6F4JZbvbY+BRH+PQ+3DtVXze0vIk1 22VcM27RAJWV/2anE/57u5Kdq/cMUR+eN6UHxQ4uJA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJdgsRRqnjOrn6yVayD4q1mdJxgqtGhLXd+cvQG2EQzHqRGvn0DQKFjW2QvkfVvJ9kayB9ujuSXN7d56/l72Bs=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d44b:: with SMTP id r11mr17909941ilm.120.1587424760382; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEz6PPRNjcZZ+m9ZHX7zCyD7VqueftpZCW_UuyBdozfmzSik-g@mail.gmail.com> <030801d4e3bb$26523be0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CAEz6PPSih7=g4oZDWypP0+MX5T_h+8SPpdb98sg_RE9jfsw-GA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB5340C9405DC5569447F664EBA2C10@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5340C9405DC5569447F664EBA2C10@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:19:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPTzosurbT_2c3C-H-CMiBm_Q6hPAQzBrh6VYRcmWhKtrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f3496605a3c1200b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Hy9nRJKbMGKB0fC-mvjxBb2IyaM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:19:23 -0000
Hi Tom, Thanks for checking. We will fix the two additional items in the next revision. Best regards, - Xufeng On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:08 AM <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote: > From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> > Sent: 12 March 2020 21:57 > > We have posted the updated version ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-05 ) to > fix the issues that you raised. > Thanks a lot, > > <tp> > Xufeng, > > looks better and apologies for being slow to respond. > > C.12 IANA, C.13 Security look odd and contradict s.5, s.6. Is there any > reason for them to exist? > [Xufeng]: These two sections should go way. The got included accidentally when another document was merged into this. We will remove these two sections. > > Security s.6 does not conform to the boiler plate referenced in RFC8407. > This asks that sensitive nodes be called out and I would think that at > least the enable nodes for connectivity matrix and link terminations would > qualify for that. > [Xufeng]: We will fix the section in the next revision. Thanks for pointing it out. > > Tom Petch > > - Xufeng > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:05 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com<mailto: > ietfa@btconnect.com>> wrote: > Xufeng > > Some quirks. > > Introduction/Abstract do not mention support or lack thereof for NMDA > (which the IESG have been calling for). > [Xufeng]: Added. > > Introduction does not have a reference for YANG leaving the question of > version number uncertain > [Xufeng]: Added. > > Terminology fails to reference RFC8174 > [Xufeng]: Fixed > > Expand on first use, perhaps in Terminology, is helpful - TOSCA, SF2LTP, > SF2SF, SF2TTP, > [Xufeng]: Fixed > > CSO > [Xufeng]: Authors and contributors discussed CSO and decided to remove it > from this document and put it into a separate document. > > yang-version 1 is rather limiting > [Xufeng]: Use 1.1 now. > > YANG import statements lack references (which YANG 1.1 allows) > > / reference "TBD";/ > reference "RFC XXXX - SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model"; / > [Xufeng]: Fixed these statements. > > module ietf-cso-dc > no version > no copyright > no reference to the I-D > no description clauses > no reference clauses > somewhat short of ready IMHO- I think that this needs a lot of work! > [Xufeng]: As mentioned above, CSO is removed from this document and > planned to be put into a separate document. > > IANA Considerations > RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with the > actual RFC number (and remove this note). > I suggest that this apply throughout the I-D and that the Note is placed > at the start, before the Introduction (the RFC Editor are happy with > just the one note) > [Xufeng]: Changed as suggeted. > > RFC6020 is a better reference for the IANA Considerations > [Xufeng]: Right. Use RFC6020 now. > > [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores] > RFC8342 > [Xufeng]: Fixed. > > [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] > RFC8340 > [Xufeng]: Fixed. > > [I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo] > RFC8345 > [Xufeng]: Fixed. > > import ietf-actn-vn { > does not appear in section 1.3 > [Xufeng]: Added. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Xufeng Liu" <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com<mailto: > xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>> > To: "TEAS WG" <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:02 PM > Subject: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model > > > > Current Status: > > > > * The updated revision -03 was posted on Mar 11, 2019: > > > > > Editorial fixes. > > > > Open Issues: > > > > * None. > > > > Next Steps: > > > > * Update the document to align with the latest versions of > > referenced documents, including draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo, > > RFC8340, RFC8342, RFC8345, and RFC8459. > > * Update the section of Security Considerations according to latest > > guidelines. > > * Get further reviews. > > * YANG doctor's review. > > * Working Group Last Call after completing above. > > > > Thanks, > > - Xufeng > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Teas mailing list > > Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas > > > >
- [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… ietfa
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aw… Xufeng Liu