Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 20 April 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6EC3A1284 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjBigaWWWhFi for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CAC3A127E for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id t10so11638501ilg.9 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gh7Up997GuUP02a2CxfCBfSw9PDTOuzAwAWHMs5W4Ns=; b=JVlxMtViNmMYFT8h1oVqC8tOE4i6sWYm8W5/WDRK3Vis4vGscxEUDtTFcR7X28Echv Ygal21vp3rtglEitvLufNPkPMew4v+q6VB4+ZtwSIsGFWZ1YEbmtpL7OGzMIimlqH/Fi LK6wKygNcVOB+3Vwoe113kl6bqnnpzIn7bDCYwat4TAuaQ2DRRsRvOl6haNRj1LeNf9o IUnPopwjmqGCs4VECJaYafU2tqVO6x3Z9YVPdzF+u4bc4vzY7ybGeJQ5O0UTWjB5UyaH flSTwmeF4LH0L6SIMSkn5B7rhg2MbxqDbgCJ5GW/P33CkmsRy5pFyX6/vQ0Q6qG0FzVT aOQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gh7Up997GuUP02a2CxfCBfSw9PDTOuzAwAWHMs5W4Ns=; b=VQAehcNjS7+JiLDIrNTv7WYMAzNaw0zou+RLIk8x33lD7Pl/pDuKm2jdjWewKRB12u pF8L2Yco9MsCT6b/Va/4+Ee4r6XD3Gx9NmLaUQ3c3JhGKSpdADqFkkYrfKblh/JOD05F Ce7e8HyJalgzduw4yUYt/nNbKoSRIl7TN9Pb+Q+634luR3WUy5Ekniud1SKLINxe/Hfa PRNiUMWZ5wFZuIMzKLFpiKmmonZ88bZ1KebUqslDS8jD8eHTrzXI2qn/83N62qdpGZ7j PpKpse3r2ZEXOOhdH2rtr20Bd2ab89D7IlI2wYW0NHrK+jimm0Po89ReshtT7AL+oqQ8 hiew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY4iKi/vKWgwaxqjcTb8/g6F4JZbvbY+BRH+PQ+3DtVXze0vIk1 22VcM27RAJWV/2anE/57u5Kdq/cMUR+eN6UHxQ4uJA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJdgsRRqnjOrn6yVayD4q1mdJxgqtGhLXd+cvQG2EQzHqRGvn0DQKFjW2QvkfVvJ9kayB9ujuSXN7d56/l72Bs=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d44b:: with SMTP id r11mr17909941ilm.120.1587424760382; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEz6PPRNjcZZ+m9ZHX7zCyD7VqueftpZCW_UuyBdozfmzSik-g@mail.gmail.com> <030801d4e3bb$26523be0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CAEz6PPSih7=g4oZDWypP0+MX5T_h+8SPpdb98sg_RE9jfsw-GA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB5340C9405DC5569447F664EBA2C10@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5340C9405DC5569447F664EBA2C10@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:19:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPTzosurbT_2c3C-H-CMiBm_Q6hPAQzBrh6VYRcmWhKtrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f3496605a3c1200b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Hy9nRJKbMGKB0fC-mvjxBb2IyaM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:19:23 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thanks for checking. We will fix the two additional items in the next
revision.
Best regards,
- Xufeng

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:08 AM <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:

> From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
> Sent: 12 March 2020 21:57
>
> We have posted the updated version (
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-05 ) to
> fix the issues that you raised.
> Thanks a lot,
>
> <tp>
> Xufeng,
>
> looks better and apologies for being slow to respond.
>
> C.12 IANA, C.13 Security look odd and contradict s.5, s.6.  Is there any
> reason for them to exist?
>
[Xufeng]: These two sections should go way. The got included accidentally
when another document was merged into this. We will remove these two
sections.

>
> Security s.6 does not conform to the boiler plate referenced in RFC8407.
> This asks that sensitive nodes be called out and I would think that at
> least the enable nodes for connectivity matrix and link terminations would
> qualify for that.
>
[Xufeng]: We will fix the section in the next revision. Thanks for pointing
it out.

>
> Tom Petch
>
> - Xufeng
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 6:05 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com<mailtomailto:
> ietfa@btconnect.com>> wrote:
> Xufeng
>
> Some quirks.
>
> Introduction/Abstract do not mention support or lack thereof  for NMDA
> (which the IESG have been calling for).
> [Xufeng]: Added.
>
> Introduction does not have a reference for YANG leaving the question of
> version number uncertain
> [Xufeng]: Added.
>
> Terminology fails to reference RFC8174
> [Xufeng]: Fixed
>
> Expand on first use, perhaps in Terminology, is helpful - TOSCA, SF2LTP,
> SF2SF, SF2TTP,
> [Xufeng]: Fixed
>
> CSO
> [Xufeng]: Authors and contributors discussed CSO and decided to remove it
> from this document and put it into a separate document.
>
> yang-version 1 is rather limiting
> [Xufeng]: Use 1.1 now.
>
> YANG import statements lack references (which YANG 1.1 allows)
>
> /       reference "TBD";/
>        reference "RFC XXXX - SF Aware TE Topology YANG Model"; /
> [Xufeng]: Fixed these statements.
>
>    module ietf-cso-dc
> no version
> no copyright
> no reference to the I-D
> no description clauses
> no reference clauses
> somewhat short of ready IMHO- I think that this needs a lot of work!
> [Xufeng]: As mentioned above, CSO is removed from this document and
> planned to be put into a separate document.
>
> IANA Considerations
>    RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with the
>    actual RFC number (and remove this note).
> I suggest that this apply throughout the I-D and that the Note is placed
> at the start, before the Introduction (the RFC Editor are happy with
> just the one note)
> [Xufeng]: Changed as suggeted.
>
> RFC6020 is a better reference for the IANA Considerations
> [Xufeng]: Right. Use  RFC6020 now.
>
>    [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores]
> RFC8342
> [Xufeng]: Fixed.
>
>    [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams]
> RFC8340
> [Xufeng]:  Fixed.
>
>    [I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo]
> RFC8345
> [Xufeng]: Fixed.
>
>      import ietf-actn-vn {
> does not appear in section 1.3
> [Xufeng]: Added.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Xufeng Liu" <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com<mailtomailto:
> xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>>
> To: "TEAS WG" <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:02 PM
> Subject: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
>
>
> > Current Status:
> >
> >   *  The updated revision -03 was posted on Mar 11, 2019:
> >
> >      > Editorial fixes.
> >
> > Open Issues:
> >
> >   *   None.
> >
> > Next Steps:
> >
> >   *  Update the document to align with the latest versions of
> >      referenced documents, including draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo,
> >      RFC8340, RFC8342, RFC8345, and RFC8459.
> >   *  Update the section of Security Considerations according to latest
> >      guidelines.
> >   *  Get further reviews.
> >   *  YANG doctor's review.
> >   *  Working Group Last Call after completing above.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Xufeng
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> >
>
>