IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability (New Authors)

Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato@huawei.com> Mon, 26 July 2021 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A501B3A1E3C; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxSIGX0N4n6S; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4DFF3A1E3A; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GY9fD5PJqz6DHZp; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:55:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml740-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.221) by fraeml744-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:04:07 +0200
Received: from fraeml740-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.221]) by fraeml740-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.221]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:04:07 +0200
From: Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "brfoster@cisco.com" <brfoster@cisco.com>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability (New Authors)
Thread-Index: AQHXf+fJmvPYEDCQTkGQamaKw/4s+6tU2Pbg
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:04:07 +0000
Message-ID: <6d4432e43ea3438084bc947ab4c30c43@huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTsO1zxEhTidCmcdPrj0UywcQo3xeG8e+TGm-zEj-eHcpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTsO1zxEhTidCmcdPrj0UywcQo3xeG8e+TGm-zEj-eHcpg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.93.158]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6d4432e43ea3438084bc947ab4c30c43huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/IAa_hTW4AU25SVVwRlpXkpDwH0k>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability (New Authors)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:04:16 -0000

Hi,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Best regards
Paolo

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 7:25 PM
To: brfoster@cisco.com; Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability (New Authors)

Newly added Authors/Contributors (on WG document),

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

ps: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email