[Teas] Re: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG LC comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis

[Italo Busi <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Aihua for the suggestion

IMHO, if there is a hierarchical relationship between LSC and WSON-LSC/Flexi-Grid-LSC, it is a good idea to reflect it into YANG

However, since I was not an active IETF participants at the time these three LSCs (and the LSC in RFC 3471 in particular) have been defined, I am not sure that this hierarchical relationship exists or not

Can other experts in CCAMP/TEAS WGs confirm whether there is a hierarchical relationship between LSC and WSON-LSC/Flexi-Grid-LSC?

Thanks, Italo

From: Aihua Guo <[e-mail]>
Sent: martedì 12 novembre 2024 16:50
To: Sergio Belotti (Nokia) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <[e-mail]>; tom petch <[e-mail]>; Italo Busi <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG LC comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis

+1 for RFC9093bis. Also, for WSON-LSC and flexi-grid LSC, the base identity should be LSC.

Aihua

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:02 AM Sergio Belotti (Nokia) <sergio.belotti=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
+1

Thanks
Sergio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <dceccare=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 2:28 PM
> To: tom petch <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; Italo Busi
> <Italo.Busi=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Subject: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG LC
> comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis
>
>
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or
> opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext<http://nok.it/ext> for additional information.
>
>
>
> +1
>
> Cheers
> Daniele
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tom petch <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2024 1:06 PM
> To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Subject: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG LC
> comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis
>
> From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Sent: 09 November 2024 11:18
>
> I have recently noted that there are no standardized YANG identities that could be
> used to represent the WSON-LSC, defined in RFC 7688, and flexi-grid LSC, defined
> in RFC 8363
>
> I am not sure whether these identities are better defined in TE Types (RFC 8776-
> bis) or Layer0 Types (RFC 9093-bis) YANG models but since both drafts are in WG
> LC we can fix in either was this gap
>
> My personal preference is to add them to RFC 9093-bis in order to avoid the need
> to update TE Types any time a new technology-specific switching type or LSP
> encoding type is defined
>
> What do you think?
>
> <tp>
> I agree
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
>
> Italo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list -- [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list -- [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list -- [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>