Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 28 December 2020 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C723A0D42 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:44:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXAIY059u2ST for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF7C3A0D39 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 11:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0BSJiRCe011424 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:44:27 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E862203B for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:44:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F1812203A for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:44:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.113.187.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0BSJiQmF012226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:44:26 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
References: <160918455990.11071.13046543401420437240@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160918455990.11071.13046543401420437240@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:44:26 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <00ca01d6dd51$da0af910$8e20eb30$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQH5r5QAMtQWUlq1DqlBS3/RuNey5qnHRGmA
X-Originating-IP: 87.113.187.83
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25878.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.423-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.423-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25878.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.423300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: PL66URbwWA9or4mPA3EMtnFPUrVDm6jtWw/S0HB7eoNMZndmdyrv72Ws 1FNpZyZa3Xl/8XNxIVNzfudkiwJIgCpY36uQ+6rNIjKSH8rlATtzHsCOuSqn1sNAewdCCM5EdEa sd1CUyXRuLHi0/atw9rerXBH8z686F9jyOYwXFHQCOhpLDQSMVVHewY36PuY0YOy4ZpFChjZuni JOkZD09AK8w9n/IjsztFjIJKoKk8TuNO1zKrjbZv0K1EzSco4pxkm+0YpML1dySYZtwNAWH/PD3 CqjqQZmOcgZjfzPahACScQet7UaVP9IzD24yv0f5Qo03mEdwAEniz7sSpR5fP2ZU/fHYSOZfMrd D3NIUvsQzlBDnKBP6GYZz1Uq/s4cnjSHsAz2g+2iXc/ZBk0gbwEoHzC4m9uQC/U4++8MvOyjzmZ bb4xm5tMrl0lZctFT0+pR+Ea5cILEHirX+Fj0c3zmmMD/HXF+mHAp2UJ8+TybKItl61J/ycnjLT A/UDoAnL8I93XanomnpRDhGwzj290H8LFZNFG7/nnwJ52QYi8eXz23OFA1w45vPnP+cEimKB5Nn TFuLchwBVgZA62DFvKxajy0nkA/nqg/VrSZEiM=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/I_MM8il-eolXArm4hf-_8UJ_xDM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 19:44:32 -0000

The New Year edition of this draft includes a small section on QUIC and
another on flex-algo (thanks to Boris for both of these), and a few words on
security by me.

We're down to just one missing section (intent-based networking).

Now we really need some critical reviews.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 28 December 2020 19:43
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic
Engineering
        Author          : Adrian Farrel
	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10.txt
	Pages           : 82
	Date            : 2020-12-28

Abstract:
   This document describes the principles of traffic engineering (TE) in
   the Internet.  The document is intended to promote better
   understanding of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in IP
   networks and the networks that support IP networking, and to provide
   a common basis for the development of traffic engineering
   capabilities for the Internet.  The principles, architectures, and
   methodologies for performance evaluation and performance optimization
   of operational networks are also discussed.

   This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002.  This document
   obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text in
   line with best current practices for Internet traffic engineering and
   to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-10